NEURACAP
Sector ReportSep 28, 2026 · 21 pages · Free to read

Diversified REITs Sector Outlook — September 2026

NeuraCap's Diversified REITs sector outlook: who plays, how the market prices them, what has transacted, and what it means for owners, operators and acquirers.

Download PDFDownload PowerPoint

Key figures

14.5x
Sector median EV/EBITDA
18.5x
Premium end EV/EBITDA vs 2.7x at the discount end
13
Transactions with disclosed terms

Read the report

C:\Users\dawoo\OneDrive\Desktop\Deployments\neuracap_sector_reports_fable\Code\NeuraCap_Sector_Report_Pipeline_v2.1.0\ncsr\deck_kit\assets\logo_light_full.png

REAL ESTATE › EQUITY REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUSTS (REITS) › DIVERSIFIED REITS

Diversified REITs: Premium Valuations Sit with Portfolio Proof

The report shows how portfolio mix, earnings durability and capital allocation shape standing across the peer set.

September 2026 · Prepared by NeuraCap AI · Confidential

Market data as of 2026-09-28 · primary valuation basis EV / EBITDA (CY2027E)

Diversified REITs Coverage | September 2026 | Confidential | Not investment advice

1

1 / 21

Executive summary

Diversified REITs cover materially different property, credit and operating models, so portfolio labels alone do not settle valuation. The estimated names show a wide forward EV / EBITDA range, while higher reported margins sit below the valuation reference. Owners can strengthen their standing by proving that diversification improves resilience, internal growth is executable and capital allocation sharpens portfolio quality.

Key findings

  • Residential Sits at the Premium End; Office Reaches the Discount End
  • Limited Forward Coverage Calls for Triangulation
  • Higher Margins Do Not Map Cleanly to Higher Multiples
  • The Transaction Record Spans Different Announced Rationales

What each page shows

The analyst’s walkthrough of the deck, page by page.

  1. 01

    REAL ESTATE › EQUITY REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUSTS (REITS) › DIVERSIFIED REITS

    REAL ESTATE › EQUITY REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUSTS (REITS) › DIVERSIFIED REITS.

    Cover — Diversified REITs sector insights, September 2026. Prepared by NeuraCap AI; market data as of 2026-09-28; primary valuation basis EV / EBITDA (CY2027E). The framing line carries the deck's finding with the figures stripped. 1

    Everything on this page

    REAL ESTATE › EQUITY REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUSTS (REITS) › DIVERSIFIED REITS Diversified REITs: Premium Valuations Sit with Portfolio Proof The report shows how portfolio mix, earnings durability and capital allocation shape standing across the peer set. September 2026 · Prepared by NeuraCap AI · Confidential Market data as of 2026-09-28 · primary valuation basis EV / EBITDA (CY2027E) Diversified REITs Coverage | September 2026 | Confidential | Not investment advice Sources & methodology 1

  2. 02
    CONTENTS

    What This Report Covers

    What This Report Covers.

    Contents — the report runs 5 numbered sections plus the appendix: the bottom line, the landscape, valuation & situations, precedent transactions, strategic implications. The Bottom Line comes first by design: a reader who stops after section 01 still leaves with the whole story. 2

    Everything on this page

    CONTENTS What This Report Covers 01 The Bottom Line Diversified REITs Span a Wide Valuation Range 02 The Landscape Different Property Models Demand Different Value Cases 03 Valuation & Situations Forward Multiples Separate Sharply Across the Estimated Names 04 Precedent Transactions Precedent Transactions Show Buyers Pursuing Different Forms of Real Estate Value 05 Strategic Implications Portfolio Coherence and Internal Growth Strengthen Strategic Standing 06 Appendix Comparables Detail, Methodology, Sources and Assumptions Diversified REITs Coverage | September 2026 | Confidential | Not investment advice Sources & methodology 2

  3. 03
    01 · THE BOTTOM LINE

    Diversified REITs Span Residential Premiums and Office Discounts

    Diversified REITs Span Residential Premiums and Office Discounts.

    Diversified REITs Span Residential Premiums and Office Discounts The full story on one page · figures on EV / EBITDA (CY2027E), market data as of 2026-09-28 Source: NeuraCap analytics platform; market data and consensus estimates as of 2026-09-28; company disclosures via SEC EDGAR where linked. Primary valuation basis: EV / EBITDA on CY2027E consensus (4 of 24 companies eligible; multiples failing the platform's plausibility gates are excluded, never plotted). Qualitative characterisations are NeuraCap views. 3

    Everything on this page

    01 · THE BOTTOM LINE Diversified REITs Span Residential Premiums and Office Discounts The full story on one page · figures on EV / EBITDA (CY2027E), market data as of 2026-09-28 Source: NeuraCap analytics platform; market data and consensus estimates as of 2026-09-28; company disclosures via SEC EDGAR where linked. Primary valuation basis: EV / EBITDA on CY2027E consensus (4 of 24 companies eligible; multiples failing the platform's plausibility gates are excluded, never plotted). Qualitative characterisations are NeuraCap views. Diversified REITs Coverage | September 2026 | Confidential | Not investment advice Sources & methodology 3 1 Residential Sits at the Premium End; Office Reaches the Discount End Among the 4 companies with a forward EV / EBITDA estimate, Equity LifeStyle Properties, Inc. [ELS] sits at 18.5x, alongside residential exposure. Brandywine Realty Trust [BDN] sits at 2.7x, at the office-heavy discount end. 2 Limited Forward Coverage Calls for Triangulation Only 4 of 24 approved companies carry a forward EV / EBITDA estimate, with 14.5x at the middle of the range. A forward multiple already credits forecast growth, so a premium that remains can signal confidence in earnings durability. 3 Higher Margins Do Not Map Cleanly to Higher Multiples Among the 4 companies with a forward EV / EBITDA estimate, the two above the valuation reference carry EBITDA margins of 43% and 49%. The two below it carry 54% and 66%, keeping portfolio quality and cash-flow resilience central to the value case. 4 The Transaction Record Spans Different Announced Rationales The announced SoftBank Group Corp. and DigitalBridge Group, Inc. transaction was valued at $2.8B and 8.3x EV / Revenue. Starwood Property Trust, Inc. [STWD] announced its $2.2B acquisition of Fundamental Income Properties, LLC, illustrating another route to portfolio expansion. 14.5x Sector median EV/EBITDA CY2027E consensus · 4 rated of 24 companies 18.5x Premium end EV/EBITDA vs 2.7x at the discount end top quartile (n=1) against bottom quartile (n=1) on EV/EBITDA — the spread the report explains 13 Transactions with disclosed terms 42 recorded in this tier · 3 told as case studies, the full list in the appendix

  4. 04
    SECTION 02

    02

    02.

    Section 02 of 06 — Different Property Models Demand Different Value Cases. Portfolio resilience, lease economics and capital needs vary materially across the sector map. Use this divider to reset the room before the section's pages; the progress dots show where the argument stands. 4

    Everything on this page

    SECTION 02 02 THE LANDSCAPE Different Property Models Demand Different Value Cases Portfolio resilience, lease economics and capital needs vary materially across the sector map. 02 of 06 Diversified REITs Coverage | September 2026 | Confidential | Not investment advice Sources & methodology 4

  5. 05
    02 · MARKET MAP

    The Sector Mix Spans Equity REITs, Property Specialists and Adjacent Credit Models

    The Sector Mix Spans Equity REITs, Property Specialists and Adjacent Credit Models.

    The Sector Mix Spans Equity REITs, Property Specialists and Adjacent Credit Models 24 approved companies grouped by business segment · median EV / EBITDA (CY2027E) per group · as of 2026-09-28 Source: NeuraCap analytics platform; market data and consensus estimates as of 2026-09-28; company disclosures via SEC EDGAR where linked. Segment grouping follows the platform's classification; group medians on rated names only. "Why it matters" lines are NeuraCap views. 5

    Everything on this page

    02 · MARKET MAP The Sector Mix Spans Equity REITs, Property Specialists and Adjacent Credit Models 24 approved companies grouped by business segment · median EV / EBITDA (CY2027E) per group · as of 2026-09-28 Source: NeuraCap analytics platform; market data and consensus estimates as of 2026-09-28; company disclosures via SEC EDGAR where linked. Segment grouping follows the platform's classification; group medians on rated names only. "Why it matters" lines are NeuraCap views. Diversified REITs Coverage | September 2026 | Confidential | Not investment advice Sources & methodology 5 ADJACENT: MORTGAGE REITS 9 cos no rated names STWD PMT CIM TRTX ACRE GPMT ADAM MFA NLY Mortgage REITs bring credit underwriting and financing sensitivity into a set otherwise anchored in property ownership. DIVERSIFIED EQUITY REITS 6 cos 11.7x · 1 rated EPRT SAFE JBGS ESRT AAT CTO Diversified equity REITs matter where portfolio breadth improves cash-flow resilience and capital allocation remains coherent. OFFICE REITS 3 cos median 10.1x VNO BDN ONL Office REITs concentrate the debate around occupancy, leasing spreads, capital needs and near-term lease rollover. RESIDENTIAL REITS 2 cos 18.5x · 1 rated ELS MRP Residential REITs provide a view on recurring demand, tenant retention and supply-constrained markets. RETAIL REITS 2 cos no rated names O PINE Retail REITs place tenant credit, contractual rent growth and property-level demand at the centre of the value case. ADJACENT MODELS 2 cos no rated names FRPH MAYS Adjacent models broaden the map to businesses whose economics do not fit neatly within the core property categories.

  6. 06
    02 · LANDSCAPE

    Portfolio Mix Changes the Cash-Flow Risks Owners Need to Defend

    Portfolio Mix Changes the Cash-Flow Risks Owners Need to Defend.

    Portfolio Mix Changes the Cash-Flow Risks Owners Need to Defend Segment view of the approved universe · EV / EBITDA (CY2027E) medians on rated names · as of 2026-09-28 Source: NeuraCap analytics platform; market data and consensus estimates as of 2026-09-28; company disclosures via SEC EDGAR where linked. "What they do / why it matters" is a NeuraCap view. Full company-level detail in the appendix and companion tables. 6

    Everything on this page

    02 · LANDSCAPE Portfolio Mix Changes the Cash-Flow Risks Owners Need to Defend Segment view of the approved universe · EV / EBITDA (CY2027E) medians on rated names · as of 2026-09-28 Source: NeuraCap analytics platform; market data and consensus estimates as of 2026-09-28; company disclosures via SEC EDGAR where linked. "What they do / why it matters" is a NeuraCap view. Full company-level detail in the appendix and companion tables. Diversified REITs Coverage | September 2026 | Confidential | Not investment advice Sources & methodology 6 Segment n Share of universe Median EV/EBITDA Names to know What they do — and why it matters Adjacent: mortgage REITs 9 38% — Starwood Property Trust, Inc. (STWD) · PennyMac Mortgage Investment Trust (PMT) · +7 more Credit economics shape outcomes. These businesses add financing capacity, collateral quality and interest-rate sensitivity to the sector discussion. Diversified equity REITs 6 25% 11.7x n=1 Essential Properties Realty Trust, Inc. (EPRT) · Safehold Inc. (SAFE) · +4 more Breadth needs operating logic. Diversification matters when it improves resilience, supports capital recycling and avoids a persistent conglomerate discount. Office REITs 3 13% 10.1x Vornado Realty Trust (VNO) · Brandywine Realty Trust (BDN) · +1 more Lease execution carries weight. Occupancy, leasing spreads, recurring capital needs and lease rollover shape the durability of office cash flow. Residential REITs 2 8% 18.5x n=1 Equity LifeStyle Properties, Inc. (ELS) · Millrose Properties, Inc. (MRP) Recurring demand supports visibility. Tenant retention, market supply and embedded rent growth frame the resilience of residential earnings. Retail REITs 2 8% — Realty Income Corporation (O) · Alpine Income Property Trust, Inc. (PINE) Tenant quality anchors cash flow. Tenant credit, weighted average lease term and mark-to-market potential influence the durability of retail income. Adjacent models 2 8% — FRP Holdings, Inc. (FRPH) · J.W. Mays, Inc. (MAYS) Different economics require separation. These businesses warrant distinct treatment where development, services or other activities change the cash-flow profile.

  7. 07
    SECTION 03

    03

    03.

    Section 03 of 06 — Forward Multiples Separate Sharply Across the Estimated Names. The premium survives a forward lens, placing greater weight on the durability of forecast earnings. Use this divider to reset the room before the section's pages; the progress dots show where the argument stands. 7

    Everything on this page

    SECTION 03 03 VALUATION & SITUATIONS Forward Multiples Separate Sharply Across the Estimated Names The premium survives a forward lens, placing greater weight on the durability of forecast earnings. 03 of 06 Diversified REITs Coverage | September 2026 | Confidential | Not investment advice Sources & methodology 7

  8. 08
    03 · PUBLIC MARKET VALUATION

    Forward EV / EBITDA Separates the Premium and Discount Ends of the Estimated Set

    Forward EV / EBITDA Separates the Premium and Discount Ends of the Estimated Set.

    Forward EV / EBITDA Separates the Premium and Discount Ends of the Estimated Set EV / EBITDA (CY2027E) · all 4 rated companies, sorted descending · sector median 14.5x · as of 2026-09-28 Source: NeuraCap analytics platform; market data and consensus estimates as of 2026-09-28; company disclosures via SEC EDGAR where linked. Primary valuation basis: EV / EBITDA on CY2027E consensus (4 of 24 companies eligible; multiples failing the platform's plausibility gates are excluded, never plotted). Tier zones are NeuraCap groupings cut at the rated set's quartiles; every multiple quoted on this page is a median on the same EV / EBITDA (CY2027E) basis. Panel commentary is a NeuraCap view. 8

    Everything on this page

    03 · PUBLIC MARKET VALUATION Forward EV / EBITDA Separates the Premium and Discount Ends of the Estimated Set EV / EBITDA (CY2027E) · all 4 rated companies, sorted descending · sector median 14.5x · as of 2026-09-28 Source: NeuraCap analytics platform; market data and consensus estimates as of 2026-09-28; company disclosures via SEC EDGAR where linked. Primary valuation basis: EV / EBITDA on CY2027E consensus (4 of 24 companies eligible; multiples failing the platform's plausibility gates are excluded, never plotted). Tier zones are NeuraCap groupings cut at the rated set's quartiles; every multiple quoted on this page is a median on the same EV / EBITDA (CY2027E) basis. Panel commentary is a NeuraCap view. Diversified REITs Coverage | September 2026 | Confidential | Not investment advice Sources & methodology 8 PREMIUM · median 18.5x CORE · median 14.5x DISCOUNT · median 2.7x Sector median 14.5x WHAT SEPARATES THE TWO ENDS The range remains wide. The premium tier is marked at 18.5x, while the discount tier is marked at 2.7x across the 4 companies with a forward EV / EBITDA estimate. Forward pricing raises the bar. Because the lens already incorporates forecast earnings, the premium end carries an implicit test of whether cash-flow quality can endure. Property mix changes the question. Residential exposure occupies the premium end, while office exposure reaches the discount end, putting occupancy, lease rollover and recurring capital needs in focus.

  9. 09
    03 · VALUATION DRIVERS

    Profitability Alone Does Not Secure the Higher Forward Multiple

    Profitability Alone Does Not Secure the Higher Forward Multiple.

    Profitability Alone Does Not Secure the Higher Forward Multiple Median EV / EBITDA (CY2027E) by revenue-growth cohort and by EBITDA-margin cohort (each split at its covered median) · rated names with estimates · as of 2026-09-28 Source: NeuraCap analytics platform; market data and consensus estimates as of 2026-09-28; company disclosures via SEC EDGAR where linked. Cohort medians on rated names with the required estimates (faster n=0; slower n=0; higher-margin n=0; lower-margin n=0). Driver readings are NeuraCap views on the supplied data — association, not causation. 9

    Everything on this page

    03 · VALUATION DRIVERS Profitability Alone Does Not Secure the Higher Forward Multiple Median EV / EBITDA (CY2027E) by revenue-growth cohort and by EBITDA-margin cohort (each split at its covered median) · rated names with estimates · as of 2026-09-28 Source: NeuraCap analytics platform; market data and consensus estimates as of 2026-09-28; company disclosures via SEC EDGAR where linked. Cohort medians on rated names with the required estimates (faster n=0; slower n=0; higher-margin n=0; lower-margin n=0). Driver readings are NeuraCap views on the supplied data — association, not causation. Diversified REITs Coverage | September 2026 | Confidential | Not investment advice Sources & methodology 9 Higher Margins Sit Below the Valuation Reference Within the 4 companies with a forward EV / EBITDA estimate, American Assets Trust, Inc. [AAT] and Brandywine Realty Trust [BDN] combine higher EBITDA margins with below-reference multiples. Growth and Valuation Do Not Move in Lockstep Equity LifeStyle Properties, Inc. [ELS] carries 4% growth at the premium end, while Brandywine Realty Trust [BDN] carries -8% growth at the discount end. The small estimated set supports an association, not a causal conclusion. REIT Quality Extends Beyond Reported Margin Same-property NOI, occupancy, leasing spreads, tenant credit and recurring capital expenditure help distinguish durable property cash flow from accounting profitability. Internal Growth Can Sharpen the Portfolio Case Lease mark-to-market, redevelopment and densification can support growth without relying solely on acquisitions, subject to capital needs and execution.

  10. 10
    03 · SITUATION MAP

    Higher Forward Multiples Sit with Lower-Margin Names in the Estimated Set

    Higher Forward Multiples Sit with Lower-Margin Names in the Estimated Set.

    Higher Forward Multiples Sit with Lower-Margin Names in the Estimated Set Cut on EV / EBITDA vs the sector median (14.5x) (rows) and EBITDA margin vs the covered median (51%) (columns) · observations, not recommendations Source: NeuraCap analytics platform; market data and consensus estimates as of 2026-09-28; company disclosures via SEC EDGAR where linked. Situation boundaries are the cohort's own medians (Directional, NeuraCap view). This page characterises situations; it does not recommend buying or selling any security. 10

    Everything on this page

    03 · SITUATION MAP Higher Forward Multiples Sit with Lower-Margin Names in the Estimated Set Cut on EV / EBITDA vs the sector median (14.5x) (rows) and EBITDA margin vs the covered median (51%) (columns) · observations, not recommendations Source: NeuraCap analytics platform; market data and consensus estimates as of 2026-09-28; company disclosures via SEC EDGAR where linked. Situation boundaries are the cohort's own medians (Directional, NeuraCap view). This page characterises situations; it does not recommend buying or selling any security. Diversified REITs Coverage | September 2026 | Confidential | Not investment advice Sources & methodology 10 Higher Multiple · Higher Margin Above-median multiple · above-median EBITDA margin 0 names No rated names sit in this cell as of the analysis date. Higher Multiple · Lower Margin Above-median multiple · below-median EBITDA margin 2 names Vornado Realty Trust (VNO) · Equity LifeStyle Properties, Inc. (ELS) Vornado Realty Trust [VNO] and Equity LifeStyle Properties, Inc. [ELS] sit above the valuation reference with margins of 43% and 49%. Their position keeps portfolio mix and earnings durability in focus alongside profitability. Lower Multiple · Higher Margin Below-median multiple · above-median EBITDA margin 2 names American Assets Trust, Inc. (AAT) · Brandywine Realty Trust (BDN) American Assets Trust, Inc. [AAT] and Brandywine Realty Trust [BDN] sit below the valuation reference despite margins of 54% and 66%. The contrast suggests that reported margin alone does not settle the valuation question. Lower Multiple · Lower Margin Below-median multiple · below-median EBITDA margin 0 names No rated names sit in this cell as of the analysis date.

  11. 11
    03 · THE AGENDA

    Portfolio Coherence and Internal Growth Define the Strategic Choice

    Portfolio Coherence and Internal Growth Define the Strategic Choice.

    Portfolio Coherence and Internal Growth Define the Strategic Choice NeuraCap view · framed as the questions an owner or acquirer should resolve · observations, not recommendations Source: NeuraCap analytics platform; market data and consensus estimates as of 2026-09-28; company disclosures via SEC EDGAR where linked. All content on this page is Directional — NeuraCap advisory judgment grounded in the cohort data shown earlier. It does not constitute investment advice. 11

    Everything on this page

    03 · THE AGENDA Portfolio Coherence and Internal Growth Define the Strategic Choice NeuraCap view · framed as the questions an owner or acquirer should resolve · observations, not recommendations Source: NeuraCap analytics platform; market data and consensus estimates as of 2026-09-28; company disclosures via SEC EDGAR where linked. All content on this page is Directional — NeuraCap advisory judgment grounded in the cohort data shown earlier. It does not constitute investment advice. Diversified REITs Coverage | September 2026 | Confidential | Not investment advice Sources & methodology 11 Test Whether Diversification Improves Resilience Assess whether the portfolio mix reduces cash-flow volatility, strengthens tenant and market balance, and supports a coherent capital-allocation case. What changes the answer: The answer changes when diversification fails to improve occupancy, leasing outcomes or funding flexibility. Evaluate Portfolio Pruning and Capital Recycling Compare the value of retaining non-core assets with redeploying capital toward properties and markets that strengthen strategic coherence. What changes the answer: The answer changes when retained assets offer superior internal growth or meaningful diversification benefits. Advance Redevelopment and Densification Selectively Focus capital on projects where entitlements, demand and lease economics support attractive internal growth without weakening balance-sheet capacity. What changes the answer: The answer changes when project returns no longer compensate for execution risk, funding needs or delayed cash flow. Protect Flexibility Through the Debt Schedule Align capital allocation with debt maturities, secured financing limits, joint-venture rights and the need to preserve REIT status. What changes the answer: The answer changes as refinancing conditions, covenants or partner consent rights constrain available moves.

  12. 12
    SECTION 04

    04

    04.

    Section 04 of 06 — Precedent Transactions Show Buyers Pursuing Different Forms of Real Estate Value. The transaction record spans strategic combinations, portfolio expansion and targeted property investment. Use this divider to reset the room before the section's pages; the progress dots show where the argument stands. 12

    Everything on this page

    SECTION 04 04 PRECEDENT TRANSACTIONS Precedent Transactions Show Buyers Pursuing Different Forms of Real Estate Value The transaction record spans strategic combinations, portfolio expansion and targeted property investment. 04 of 06 Diversified REITs Coverage | September 2026 | Confidential | Not investment advice Sources & methodology 12

  13. 13
    04 · DEAL CASE STUDIES

    Precedent Transactions Span Strategic Pairings, Portfolio Expansion and Targeted Investment

    Precedent Transactions Span Strategic Pairings, Portfolio Expansion and Targeted Investment.

    Precedent Transactions Span Strategic Pairings, Portfolio Expansion and Targeted Investment 3 of 13 transactions with disclosed terms, told as case studies · multiples on LTM financials at announcement where disclosed · the complete list is in the appendix · as of 2026-09-28 Source: NeuraCap analytics platform; market data and consensus estimates as of 2026-09-28; company disclosures via SEC EDGAR where linked. 82 precedent record(s) carry data-quality flags (deal value unit unresolved; duplicate precedent id; financial target ev not meaningful); figures are shown as recorded in the filing. 29 recorded transactions with neither a disclosed value nor a multiple are omitted from the precedent list and the case studies (kept in the companion workbook). Deal multiples are LTM at announcement (Definitive, from filings);

    Everything on this page

    04 · DEAL CASE STUDIES Precedent Transactions Span Strategic Pairings, Portfolio Expansion and Targeted Investment 3 of 13 transactions with disclosed terms, told as case studies · multiples on LTM financials at announcement where disclosed · the complete list is in the appendix · as of 2026-09-28 Source: NeuraCap analytics platform; market data and consensus estimates as of 2026-09-28; company disclosures via SEC EDGAR where linked. 82 precedent record(s) carry data-quality flags (deal value unit unresolved; duplicate precedent id; financial target ev not meaningful); figures are shown as recorded in the filing. 29 recorded transactions with neither a disclosed value nor a multiple are omitted from the precedent list and the case studies (kept in the companion workbook). Deal multiples are LTM at announcement (Definitive, from filings); they are not directly comparable to the CY2027E public basis and no spread is claimed. "Why the deal happened" is a NeuraCap read of the recorded evidence. Diversified REITs Coverage | September 2026 | Confidential | Not investment advice Sources & methodology 13 Dec-2025 $2.8B SoftBank Group Corp. acquires DigitalBridge Group, Inc. EV / LTM revenue 8.3x EV / LTM EBITDA n/a WHY THE DEAL HAPPENED The pairing suggests interest in the target's real estate holdings and operating position. The transaction also shows a strategic buyer reaching beyond traditional property categories. HOW THE TARGET WAS VALUED The disclosed value was $2.8B at 8.3x EV / Revenue. That revenue multiple is a cross-check rather than a direct comparison with the deck's forward EV / EBITDA lens. Jul-2025 $2.2B Starwood Property Trust, Inc. acquires Fundamental Income Properties, LLC EV / LTM revenue n/a EV / LTM EBITDA n/a WHY THE DEAL HAPPENED The transaction suggests a direct route to adding assets and cash flow within an existing real estate platform. The buyer's position in mortgage REITs also points to financing capacity as part of the strategic fit. HOW THE TARGET WAS VALUED The disclosed value was $2.2B. That size benchmarks transaction scale, while the public peer analysis remains framed on forward EV / EBITDA. Jun-2021 $66M Timberline Acquisition Partners, LLC Timberline Acquisition Partners, LLC completed its acquisition of Crisp39 SPV LLC as a focused real estate… EV / LTM revenue n/a EV / LTM EBITDA n/a WHY THE DEAL HAPPENED The pairing suggests targeted asset exposure rather than a broad public-company combination. Its focused scale contrasts with the larger strategic transactions in the record. HOW THE TARGET WAS VALUED The disclosed value was $66M. It provides a scale reference, while valuation comparisons across the public set use forward EV / EBITDA.

  14. 14
    SECTION 05

    05

    05.

    Section 05 of 06 — Portfolio Coherence and Internal Growth Strengthen Strategic Standing. Owners can test where pruning, redevelopment and disciplined capital allocation improve the value case. Use this divider to reset the room before the section's pages; the progress dots show where the argument stands. 14

    Everything on this page

    SECTION 05 05 STRATEGIC IMPLICATIONS Portfolio Coherence and Internal Growth Strengthen Strategic Standing Owners can test where pruning, redevelopment and disciplined capital allocation improve the value case. 05 of 06 Diversified REITs Coverage | September 2026 | Confidential | Not investment advice Sources & methodology 14

  15. 15
    05 · STRATEGIC IMPLICATIONS

    Stronger Standing Is Associated with Coherent Portfolios and Durable Property Cash Flow

    Stronger Standing Is Associated with Coherent Portfolios and Durable Property Cash Flow.

    Stronger Standing Is Associated with Coherent Portfolios and Durable Property Cash Flow NeuraCap view · the questions this data puts on the table for the next twelve months Source: NeuraCap analytics platform; market data and consensus estimates as of 2026-09-28; company disclosures via SEC EDGAR where linked. This page is Directional — NeuraCap views drawn from the analysis in this report. Observations, not recommendations. 15

    Everything on this page

    05 · STRATEGIC IMPLICATIONS Stronger Standing Is Associated with Coherent Portfolios and Durable Property Cash Flow NeuraCap view · the questions this data puts on the table for the next twelve months Source: NeuraCap analytics platform; market data and consensus estimates as of 2026-09-28; company disclosures via SEC EDGAR where linked. This page is Directional — NeuraCap views drawn from the analysis in this report. Observations, not recommendations. Diversified REITs Coverage | September 2026 | Confidential | Not investment advice Sources & methodology 15 FOR OWNERS Make Diversification Prove Its Value Use occupancy, tenant retention, leasing spreads and capital needs to test whether portfolio breadth improves resilience or sustains a conglomerate discount. FOR MANAGEMENT Build Around Controllable Internal Growth Advance lease mark-to-market, redevelopment and densification where execution is visible and recurring capital needs remain supportable. FOR BOARDS Link Capital Allocation to Portfolio Quality Compare acquisitions, portfolio pruning, capital recycling and debt reduction against their effect on strategic coherence and balance-sheet capacity.

  16. 16
    SECTION 06

    06

    06.

    Section 06 of 06 — The Full Universe, Methodology and Sources. Comparables detail behind every figure in the body, the valuation basis, and where each underlying disclosure lives. Use this divider to reset the room before the section's pages; the progress dots show where the argument stands. 16

    Everything on this page

    SECTION 06 06 APPENDIX The Full Universe, Methodology and Sources Comparables detail behind every figure in the body, the valuation basis, and where each underlying disclosure lives. 06 of 06 Diversified REITs Coverage | September 2026 | Confidential | Not investment advice Sources & methodology 16

  17. 17
    06 · PUBLIC COMPARABLES (1 OF 1)

    Public Comparables on EV / EBITDA (CY2027E), Grouped by Valuation Tier

    Public Comparables on EV / EBITDA (CY2027E), Grouped by Valuation Tier.

    Public Comparables on EV / EBITDA (CY2027E), Grouped by Valuation Tier Teal shading marks a EV/EBITDA above the sector median (14.5x); amber marks below · 4 rated companies; 20 not rated (no eligible EV/EBITDA) · tickers link to the underlying source · as of 2026-09-28 Source: NeuraCap analytics platform; market data and consensus estimates as of 2026-09-28; company disclosures via SEC EDGAR where linked. All 4 rated rows are in this appendix and in the companion workbook, which carries the complete field set. Names without an eligible multiple are listed in the companion workbook. 17

    Everything on this page

    06 · PUBLIC COMPARABLES (1 OF 1) Public Comparables on EV / EBITDA (CY2027E), Grouped by Valuation Tier Teal shading marks a EV/EBITDA above the sector median (14.5x); amber marks below · 4 rated companies; 20 not rated (no eligible EV/EBITDA) · tickers link to the underlying source · as of 2026-09-28 Source: NeuraCap analytics platform; market data and consensus estimates as of 2026-09-28; company disclosures via SEC EDGAR where linked. All 4 rated rows are in this appendix and in the companion workbook, which carries the complete field set. Names without an eligible multiple are listed in the companion workbook. Diversified REITs Coverage | September 2026 | Confidential | Not investment advice Sources & methodology 17 Company Ticker Segment EV EV/EBITDA (CY2027E) Rev growth EBITDA margin Rule of 40 PREMIUM — ≥17.7x · median 18.5x · 1 companies Equity LifeStyle Properties, Inc. ELS Residential REITs $14.8B 18.5x 4% 49% 53 CORE — 9.4x–17.7x · median 14.5x · 2 companies Vornado Realty Trust VNO Office REITs $15.6B 17.4x 8% 43% 51 American Assets Trust, Inc. AAT Diversified equity REITs $2.9B 11.7x 2% 54% 56 DISCOUNT — <9.4x · median 2.7x · 1 companies Brandywine Realty Trust BDN Office REITs $781M 2.7x -8% 66% 58

  18. 18
    06 · PRECEDENT TRANSACTIONS (1 OF 2)

    All Precedent Transactions with Disclosed Terms, Newest First

    All Precedent Transactions with Disclosed Terms, Newest First.

    All Precedent Transactions with Disclosed Terms, Newest First 13 transactions with disclosed terms in this tier (42 recorded) · multiples on LTM financials at announcement where disclosed · deal values link to the underlying filing · as of 2026-09-28 Source: NeuraCap analytics platform; market data and consensus estimates as of 2026-09-28; company disclosures via SEC EDGAR where linked. 82 precedent record(s) carry data-quality flags (deal value unit unresolved; duplicate precedent id; financial target ev not meaningful); figures are shown as recorded in the filing. 29 recorded transactions with neither a disclosed value nor a multiple are omitted from the precedent list and the case studies (kept in the companion workbook). Deal multiples are LTM at announcement (Definitive, from filings); they are not directly comparable to the CY2027E public basis and no spread is claimed. 18

    Everything on this page

    06 · PRECEDENT TRANSACTIONS (1 OF 2) All Precedent Transactions with Disclosed Terms, Newest First 13 transactions with disclosed terms in this tier (42 recorded) · multiples on LTM financials at announcement where disclosed · deal values link to the underlying filing · as of 2026-09-28 Source: NeuraCap analytics platform; market data and consensus estimates as of 2026-09-28; company disclosures via SEC EDGAR where linked. 82 precedent record(s) carry data-quality flags (deal value unit unresolved; duplicate precedent id; financial target ev not meaningful); figures are shown as recorded in the filing. 29 recorded transactions with neither a disclosed value nor a multiple are omitted from the precedent list and the case studies (kept in the companion workbook). Deal multiples are LTM at announcement (Definitive, from filings); they are not directly comparable to the CY2027E public basis and no spread is claimed. Diversified REITs Coverage | September 2026 | Confidential | Not investment advice Sources & methodology 18 Date Transaction EV EV/LTM Rev EV/LTM EBITDA Why it matters Apr-2026 AREG Wizard Parent LP → Whitestone REIT $1.6B n/a n/a The announced pairing of AREG Wizard Parent LP and Whitestone REIT points to continued interest in acquiring public real estate portfolios. Feb-2026 Kennedy-Wilson Holdings, Inc. → American Assets Trust, Inc. n/a 0.7x 8.8x The terminated Kennedy-Wilson Holdings, Inc. and American Assets Trust, Inc. transaction shows that strategic fit does not ensure completion. Feb-2026 Brookfield Asset Management Ltd. → Peakstone Realty Trust $1.2B n/a n/a The announced Brookfield Asset Management Ltd. and Peakstone Realty Trust transaction reflects institutional interest in whole-company real estate exposure. Dec-2025 SoftBank Group Corp. → DigitalBridge Group, Inc. $2.8B 8.3x n/a The announced SoftBank Group Corp. and DigitalBridge Group, Inc. transaction pairs strategic capital with a real estate owner carrying digital exposure. Dec-2025 Tropic Purchaser LLC → Alexander & Baldwin, Inc. $2.0B n/a n/a The announced Tropic Purchaser LLC and Alexander & Baldwin, Inc. transaction adds another private-capital route to owning a public real estate portfolio. Jul-2025 Starwood Property Trust, Inc. → Fundamental Income Properties, LLC $2.2B n/a n/a Starwood Property Trust, Inc. [STWD] used a whole-company acquisition to add Fundamental Income Properties, LLC to its portfolio. Sep-2022 Ivory Parent, LLC → STORE Capital Corporation $14.0B n/a n/a The terminated Ivory Parent, LLC and STORE Capital Corporation transaction highlights execution risk even where the target offers substantial scale. Jun-2021 Timberline Acquisition Partners, LLC → Crisp39 SPV LLC $66M n/a n/a The completed Timberline Acquisition Partners, LLC and Crisp39 SPV LLC transaction shows activity at a more focused investment scale. Jul-2016 n/a → Milestone $107M n/a n/a The completed Milestone transaction broadens the record beyond large public-company combinations.

  19. 19
    06 · PRECEDENT TRANSACTIONS (2 OF 2)

    All Precedent Transactions with Disclosed Terms, Newest First

    All Precedent Transactions with Disclosed Terms, Newest First.

    All Precedent Transactions with Disclosed Terms, Newest First 13 transactions with disclosed terms in this tier (42 recorded) · multiples on LTM financials at announcement where disclosed · deal values link to the underlying filing · as of 2026-09-28 Source: NeuraCap analytics platform; market data and consensus estimates as of 2026-09-28; company disclosures via SEC EDGAR where linked. 82 precedent record(s) carry data-quality flags (deal value unit unresolved; duplicate precedent id; financial target ev not meaningful); figures are shown as recorded in the filing. 29 recorded transactions with neither a disclosed value nor a multiple are omitted from the precedent list and the case studies (kept in the companion workbook). Deal multiples are LTM at announcement (Definitive, from filings); they are not directly comparable to the CY2027E public basis and no spread is claimed. 19

    Everything on this page

    06 · PRECEDENT TRANSACTIONS (2 OF 2) All Precedent Transactions with Disclosed Terms, Newest First 13 transactions with disclosed terms in this tier (42 recorded) · multiples on LTM financials at announcement where disclosed · deal values link to the underlying filing · as of 2026-09-28 Source: NeuraCap analytics platform; market data and consensus estimates as of 2026-09-28; company disclosures via SEC EDGAR where linked. 82 precedent record(s) carry data-quality flags (deal value unit unresolved; duplicate precedent id; financial target ev not meaningful); figures are shown as recorded in the filing. 29 recorded transactions with neither a disclosed value nor a multiple are omitted from the precedent list and the case studies (kept in the companion workbook). Deal multiples are LTM at announcement (Definitive, from filings); they are not directly comparable to the CY2027E public basis and no spread is claimed. Diversified REITs Coverage | September 2026 | Confidential | Not investment advice Sources & methodology 19 Date Transaction EV EV/LTM Rev EV/LTM EBITDA Why it matters Jul-2015 Chambers Street Properties → Gramercy Property Trust $5.7B 0.7x n/a Aug-2014 Select Income REIT → Cole Corporate Income Trust, Inc. n/a 22.5x 18.9x Aug-2014 Pine River Mgmt. / Provident RE Advisors → Silver Bay Realty Trust n/a 3.3x n/a Value shown as recorded in the filing; deal value unit unresolved. Oct-2006 General Electric Capital Corporation → Trustreet Properties, Inc. n/a 0.7x 8.8x Value shown as recorded in the filing; deal value unit unresolved.

  20. 20
    06 · METHODOLOGY

    Sources, Assumptions and Data Quality

    Sources, Assumptions and Data Quality.

    Sources, Assumptions and Data Quality How this report was built, what was excluded, and where every underlying disclosure lives · as of 2026-09-28 Every figure in this report links to the record it was taken from. Where a figure has no link, the appendix names its source and the basis on which it was read. 20

    Everything on this page

    06 · METHODOLOGY Sources, Assumptions and Data Quality How this report was built, what was excluded, and where every underlying disclosure lives · as of 2026-09-28 Every figure in this report links to the record it was taken from. Where a figure has no link, the appendix names its source and the basis on which it was read. Diversified REITs Coverage | September 2026 | Confidential | Not investment advice 20 VALUATION BASIS Primary valuation basis: EV / EBITDA on CY2027E consensus (4 of 24 companies eligible; multiples failing the platform's plausibility gates are excluded, never plotted). EV / EBITDA on CY2027E is the lead convention: it is the sector-appropriate prior for Diversified REITs and it clears the coverage gate with 5 of 24 companies (21%). EV / Revenue, P / E are carried as a cross-check. The set earns: 5 of the 5 companies with a reported forward EBITDA carry a meaningful one, so the profit multiple leads and a revenue multiple would understate what the market is pricing. DATA QUALITY & EXCLUSIONS 32 records were excluded or quarantined by the platform's validation gates (unit errors, implausible ratios, ineligible securities and classification failures); the full ledger ships in the companion tables and never feeds a statistic in this report. DEFINITIVE VS DIRECTIONAL Definitive content is disclosed or consensus data passed through stated arithmetic. Directional content — tier boundaries, situation cuts, "why it matters" commentary, the agenda pages — is NeuraCap analyst judgment and is labeled as such where it appears. WHAT THIS REPORT IS NOT This report characterises a sector. It does not recommend buying, selling or holding any security, and no statement in it should be read as investment advice or a price target. WHERE THE DATA LIVES 776 registered source documents stand behind the figures in this report. Metric hyperlinks throughout the deck open the specific filing or data record; by publisher: sec.gov (775) · home.treasury.gov (1). The companion workbook beside this deck carries the complete source index.

  21. 21

    In This Sample, Higher Forward Multiples Coexist with Lower EBITDA Margins.

    In This Sample, Higher Forward Multiples Coexist with Lower EBITDA Margins..

    Closing — In This Sample, Higher Forward Multiples Coexist with Lower EBITDA Margins. The companion tables beside this deck carry the full universe, the exclusion ledger and the complete source index for any figure a client wants to trace. 21

    Everything on this page

    In This Sample, Higher Forward Multiples Coexist with Lower EBITDA Margins. NeuraCap AI — Diversified REITs Coverage September 2026 · Prepared by NeuraCap AI · Confidential Diversified REITs Coverage | September 2026 | Confidential | Not investment advice Sources & methodology 21

Sources and methodology

This report covers Diversified REITs (Real Estate › Equity Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs) › Diversified REITs) with market data and consensus estimates as of September 28, 2026. The company universe is the 24 listed companies whose core business is Diversified REITs according to NeuraCap's industry classification of each company's reported business segments (a company is included only when this industry is central to what it does, not merely adjacent to it). Companies in the set: American Assets Trust, Inc. (AAT), Ares Commercial Real Estate Corporation (ACRE), Adamas Trust, Inc. (ADAM), Brandywine Realty Trust (BDN), Chimera Investment Corporation (CIM), CTO Realty Growth, Inc. (CTO), Equity LifeStyle Properties, Inc. (ELS), Essential Properties Realty Trust, Inc. (EPRT), Empire State Realty Trust, Inc. (ESRT), FRP Holdings, Inc. (FRPH), Granite Point Mortgage Trust Inc. (GPMT), JBG SMITH Properties (JBGS), J.W. Mays, Inc. (MAYS), MFA Financial, Inc. (MFA), Millrose Properties, Inc. (MRP), Annaly Capital Management, Inc. (NLY), Realty Income Corporation (O), Orion Properties Inc. (ONL), Alpine Income Property Trust, Inc. (PINE), PennyMac Mortgage Investment Trust (PMT), Safehold Inc. (SAFE), Starwood Property Trust, Inc. (STWD), TPG RE Finance Trust, Inc. (TRTX), Vornado Realty Trust (VNO). The market map groups them by business vertical — Adjacent: mortgage REITs: 9 companies (STWD, PMT, CIM, TRTX, ACRE, GPMT, ADAM, MFA, NLY); Diversified equity REITs: 6 companies (EPRT, SAFE, JBGS, ESRT, AAT, CTO); Office REITs: 3 companies (VNO, BDN, ONL); Residential REITs: 2 companies (ELS, MRP); Retail REITs: 2 companies (O, PINE); Adjacent models: 2 companies (FRPH, MAYS). 4 of the 24 companies carry a valid multiple on the primary valuation basis and form the rated set behind every cohort statistic; the others are shown but do not enter the statistics.

Scope and company universe

This report covers Diversified REITs (Real Estate › Equity Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs) › Diversified REITs) with market data and consensus estimates as of September 28, 2026. The company universe is the 24 listed companies whose core business is Diversified REITs according to NeuraCap's industry classification of each company's reported business segments (a company is included only when this industry is central to what it does, not merely adjacent to it). Companies in the set: American Assets Trust, Inc. (AAT), Ares Commercial Real Estate Corporation (ACRE), Adamas Trust, Inc. (ADAM), Brandywine Realty Trust (BDN), Chimera Investment Corporation (CIM), CTO Realty Growth, Inc. (CTO), Equity LifeStyle Properties, Inc. (ELS), Essential Properties Realty Trust, Inc. (EPRT), Empire State Realty Trust, Inc. (ESRT), FRP Holdings, Inc. (FRPH), Granite Point Mortgage Trust Inc. (GPMT), JBG SMITH Properties (JBGS), J.W. Mays, Inc. (MAYS), MFA Financial, Inc. (MFA), Millrose Properties, Inc. (MRP), Annaly Capital Management, Inc. (NLY), Realty Income Corporation (O), Orion Properties Inc. (ONL), Alpine Income Property Trust, Inc. (PINE), PennyMac Mortgage Investment Trust (PMT), Safehold Inc. (SAFE), Starwood Property Trust, Inc. (STWD), TPG RE Finance Trust, Inc. (TRTX), Vornado Realty Trust (VNO). The market map groups them by business vertical — Adjacent: mortgage REITs: 9 companies (STWD, PMT, CIM, TRTX, ACRE, GPMT, ADAM, MFA, NLY); Diversified equity REITs: 6 companies (EPRT, SAFE, JBGS, ESRT, AAT, CTO); Office REITs: 3 companies (VNO, BDN, ONL); Residential REITs: 2 companies (ELS, MRP); Retail REITs: 2 companies (O, PINE); Adjacent models: 2 companies (FRPH, MAYS). 4 of the 24 companies carry a valid multiple on the primary valuation basis and form the rated set behind every cohort statistic; the others are shown but do not enter the statistics.

What was excluded and why

32 records failed a validation gate and never feed a statistic in this report (23 excluded from aggregate; 9 quarantined). Each exclusion, with its reason: ACRE — Non-positive EPS; P/E is n/m (effect: excluded from aggregate) · ACRE — Non-positive EPS; P/E is n/m (effect: excluded from aggregate) · BDN — Non-positive EPS; P/E is n/m (effect: excluded from aggregate) · BDN — Non-positive EPS; P/E is n/m (effect: excluded from aggregate) · BDN — Non-positive EPS; P/E is n/m (effect: excluded from aggregate) · BDN — Non-positive EPS; P/E is n/m (effect: excluded from aggregate) · CTO — Non-positive EPS; P/E is n/m (effect: excluded from aggregate) · EPRT — Implied EBITDA margin 99.4% outside the plausible band [-100%, 80%] (effect: quarantined) · EPRT — Implied EBITDA margin 98.6% outside the plausible band [-100%, 80%] (effect: quarantined) · EPRT — Implied EBITDA margin 103.4% outside the plausible band [-100%, 80%] (effect: quarantined) · GPMT — Non-positive EPS; P/E is n/m (effect: excluded from aggregate) · GPMT — Non-positive EPS; P/E is n/m (effect: excluded from aggregate) · GPMT — Non-positive EPS; P/E is n/m (effect: excluded from aggregate) · GPMT — Non-positive EPS; P/E is n/m (effect: excluded from aggregate) · JBGS — Non-positive EPS; P/E is n/m (effect: excluded from aggregate) · JBGS — Non-positive EPS; P/E is n/m (effect: excluded from aggregate) · JBGS — Non-positive EPS; P/E is n/m (effect: excluded from aggregate) · JBGS — Non-positive EPS; P/E is n/m (effect: excluded from aggregate) · MAYS — Non-positive EPS; P/E is n/m (effect: excluded from aggregate) · O — Implied EBITDA margin 116.7% outside the plausible band [-100%, 80%] (effect: quarantined) · O — Implied EBITDA margin 97.2% outside the plausible band [-100%, 80%] (effect: quarantined) · O — Implied EBITDA margin 101.3% outside the plausible band [-100%, 80%] (effect: quarantined) · ONL — Non-positive EPS; P/E is n/m (effect: excluded from aggregate) · ONL — Non-positive EPS; P/E is n/m (effect: excluded from aggregate) · ONL — Non-positive EPS; P/E is n/m (effect: excluded from aggregate) · further items are listed in the companion tables.

Primary valuation basis and how it was chosen

Primary valuation basis: EV / EBITDA on CY2027E consensus (4 of 24 companies eligible; multiples failing the platform's plausibility gates are excluded, never plotted). EV / EBITDA on CY2027E is the lead convention: it is the sector-appropriate prior for Diversified REITs and it clears the coverage gate with 5 of 24 companies (21%). EV / Revenue, P / E are carried as a cross-check. The set earns: 5 of the 5 companies with a reported forward EBITDA carry a meaningful one, so the profit multiple leads and a revenue multiple would understate what the market is pricing. The basis is selected in two steps: the industry's customary valuation conventions set the order of preference, and each convention is then tested for coverage — the share of companies with a valid, plausibility-checked multiple on the chosen period. A convention is used only when enough companies carry it; the best-covered convention is used, and disclosed, when none clears the threshold. Coverage measured for this report — EV / EBITDA: 5 of 24 companies; EV / rEVenue: 22 of 24 companies; P/E: 17 of 24 companies. 5 companies show a non-meaningful P / E denominator and are excluded from that statistic.

How the multiples and statistics are computed

Enterprise value (EV) is market capitalisation at the as-of date plus total debt minus cash and equivalents from the latest reported balance sheet, reconciled against the platform's stored value and disclosed where the two differ. Forward multiples divide EV (or the share price for P/E) by the consensus estimate for the stated calendar period; trailing multiples use the last twelve months of reported figures from SEC filings. A multiple with a negative or immaterial denominator is treated as not meaningful and excluded from every statistic. Cohort statistics are medians and quartiles over the rated set only; a group median with fewer than three observations is shown as the single company's figure and labelled as such. Valuation tiers cut the rated set at its quartiles (tiers cut at the rated set's quartiles: Premium ≥17.7x, Core 9.4x–17.7x, Discount <9.4x — NeuraCap groupings). Revenue growth compares consecutive calendar-year consensus revenue; EBITDA margin divides consensus EBITDA by consensus revenue for the same period. Figures shown in this report and the calculation behind each: 14.5x = median(ev_ebitda CY2027E) (4 rated companies) · 18.5x = median(ev_ebitda CY2027E) within Premium tier (n=1) · 14.5x = median(ev_ebitda CY2027E) within Core tier (n=2) · 2.7x = median(ev_ebitda CY2027E) within Discount tier (n=1) · 55% = median Rule of 40 score (revenue growth + EBITDA margin) (n=4)

Precedent transactions: what is in the record and why

The precedent record holds the M&A transactions in Diversified REITs recorded from SEC filings (8-K announcements and the documents they reference), newest first, with each value and multiple linked to the exact passage in the filing that states it. 42 transactions were recorded for this industry; 13 are shown. 29 recorded transactions with neither a disclosed value nor a multiple are omitted because they say nothing about price; they remain in the companion workbook. Deal multiples are enterprise value over the target's last-twelve-month revenue or EBITDA at announcement, as disclosed; they are not restated to the public basis and no spread to the public multiples is claimed. Before a transaction reaches the record it passes a screen for mirrored or duplicate filings of the same deal, for divestitures where the filer is the seller rather than the buyer, for carve-outs recorded under the parent's name, and for values whose citation describes something other than the price paid (a debt raise, a termination fee); such records are corrected or excluded and the correction is noted. Data-quality notes on this record: 27 × deal value unit unresolved; 29 × no evidence record; 12 × duplicate precedent id; 14 × financial target ev not meaningful. Case studies lead with the 3 richest stories — disclosed value, a readable multiple, newest first.

Sources

Company financials and transaction terms come from the companies' own SEC filings on EDGAR (10-K, 10-Q and 8-K documents), linked from each figure in the report. Forward figures are analyst consensus estimates for the calendar periods shown. Share prices and market capitalisations are market data as of September 28, 2026. Treasury yields are published by the U.S. Department of the Treasury. 780 source documents stand behind this report; by publisher domain: sec.gov, home.treasury.gov (1). Every figure on every page is traceable to one of these records; nothing in the report is derived from outside data.

Interpretation and important notice

Tier labels, situation maps, the agenda and the implications pages are NeuraCap analytical views drawn from the recorded evidence and are labelled as such. The report is informational: it is not investment advice, not a recommendation to buy or sell any security, not an opinion of value and not an offer of any kind. Readers should perform their own diligence before acting on anything described here.

This report is published for information only. It is not a recommendation to buy or sell any security, an offer or solicitation, an appraisal or a fairness opinion, and no fiduciary relationship is created by reading it. Multiples that fail NeuraCap’s plausibility gates are excluded and never plotted. See the full methodology and the disclaimer.

More coverage in Real Estate

Want this analysis for a company in Diversified REITs?

Company valuation reports run the same method against a single business — public or private.

Get a free sample reportBrowse the research