NEURACAP
Sector ReportSep 28, 2026 · 22 pages · Free to read

Integrated Telecommunication Services Sector Outlook — September 2026

NeuraCap's Integrated Telecommunication Services sector outlook: who plays, how the market prices them, what has transacted, and what it means for owners, operators and acquirers.

Download PDFDownload PowerPoint

Key figures

5.0x
Sector median EV/EBITDA
9.1x
Premium end EV/EBITDA vs 3.2x at the discount end
39
Transactions with disclosed terms

Read the report

C:\Users\dawoo\OneDrive\Desktop\Deployments\neuracap_sector_reports_fable\Code\NeuraCap_Sector_Report_Pipeline_v2.1.0\ncsr\deck_kit\assets\logo_light_full.png

COMMUNICATION SERVICES › TELECOMMUNICATION SERVICES › INTEGRATED TELECOMMUNICATION SERVICES

Integrated Telecom: Growth Sits with the Premium

This report shows how earnings durability, network quality and transaction fit shape relative value.

September 2026 · Prepared by NeuraCap AI · Confidential

Market data as of 2026-09-28 · primary valuation basis EV / EBITDA (CY2027E)

Integrated Telecommunication Services Coverage | September 2026 | Confidential | Not investment advice

1

1 / 22

Executive summary

Integrated Telecommunication Services remains a single operating category with widely different valuation outcomes. Faster growth is associated with higher forward valuation in this sample, while the quadrant analysis shows that margin alone does not provide a complete answer. Recurring service revenue, subscriber retention, pricing discipline and efficient network investment shape confidence in earnings durability.

Key findings

  • Recurring Earnings Offer a Practical Valuation Lens
  • Faster-Growing Operators Sit at Higher Forward Values
  • Growth Without the Higher Margin Can Still Stand Out
  • Transaction Benchmarks Vary with What Buyers Acquire

What each page shows

The analyst’s walkthrough of the deck, page by page.

  1. 01

    COMMUNICATION SERVICES › TELECOMMUNICATION SERVICES › INTEGRATED TELECOMMUNICATION SERVICES

    COMMUNICATION SERVICES › TELECOMMUNICATION SERVICES › INTEGRATED TELECOMMUNICATION SERVICES.

    Cover — Integrated Telecommunication Services sector insights, September 2026. Prepared by NeuraCap AI; market data as of 2026-09-28; primary valuation basis EV / EBITDA (CY2027E). The framing line carries the deck's finding with the figures stripped. 1

    Everything on this page

    COMMUNICATION SERVICES › TELECOMMUNICATION SERVICES › INTEGRATED TELECOMMUNICATION SERVICES Integrated Telecom: Growth Sits with the Premium This report shows how earnings durability, network quality and transaction fit shape relative value. September 2026 · Prepared by NeuraCap AI · Confidential Market data as of 2026-09-28 · primary valuation basis EV / EBITDA (CY2027E) Integrated Telecommunication Services Coverage | September 2026 | Confidential | Not investment advice Sources & methodology 1

  2. 02
    CONTENTS

    What This Report Covers

    What This Report Covers.

    Contents — the report runs 5 numbered sections plus the appendix: the bottom line, the landscape, valuation & situations, precedent transactions, strategic implications. The Bottom Line comes first by design: a reader who stops after section 01 still leaves with the whole story. 2

    Everything on this page

    CONTENTS What This Report Covers 01 The Bottom Line Growth and Durable Earnings Separate the Integrated Telecom Field 02 The Landscape One Operator Model Still Produces Widely Different Outcomes 03 Valuation & Situations Forward Valuations Separate as Growth and Durability Diverge 04 Precedent Transactions Buyers Are Pursuing Whole Companies, Footprints and Focused Assets 05 Strategic Implications Durable Growth Earns Attention When Network Economics Support It 06 Appendix Comparables Detail, Methodology, Sources and Assumptions Integrated Telecommunication Services Coverage | September 2026 | Confidential | Not investment advice Sources & methodology 2

  3. 03
    01 · THE BOTTOM LINE

    Integrated Telecommunication Services Separates Integrated Operators by Growth, Earnings Durability and Network Quality

    Integrated Telecommunication Services Separates Integrated Operators by Growth, Earnings Durability and Network Quality.

    Integrated Telecommunication Services Separates Integrated Operators by Growth, Earnings Durability and Network Quality The full story on one page · figures on EV / EBITDA (CY2027E), market data as of 2026-09-28 Source: NeuraCap analytics platform; market data and consensus estimates as of 2026-09-28; company disclosures via SEC EDGAR where linked. Primary valuation basis: EV / EBITDA on CY2027E consensus (10 of 12 companies eligible; multiples failing the platform's plausibility gates are excluded, never plotted). Qualitative characterisations are NeuraCap views. 3

    Everything on this page

    01 · THE BOTTOM LINE Integrated Telecommunication Services Separates Integrated Operators by Growth, Earnings Durability and Network Quality The full story on one page · figures on EV / EBITDA (CY2027E), market data as of 2026-09-28 Source: NeuraCap analytics platform; market data and consensus estimates as of 2026-09-28; company disclosures via SEC EDGAR where linked. Primary valuation basis: EV / EBITDA on CY2027E consensus (10 of 12 companies eligible; multiples failing the platform's plausibility gates are excluded, never plotted). Qualitative characterisations are NeuraCap views. Integrated Telecommunication Services Coverage | September 2026 | Confidential | Not investment advice Sources & methodology 3 1 Recurring Earnings Offer a Practical Valuation Lens The middle of the forward EV / EBITDA range is 5.0x across the 10 of 12 companies with an estimate. This lens reflects recurring service earnings while keeping capital structure differences in view. 2 Faster-Growing Operators Sit at Higher Forward Values On the 10 companies with an estimate, the five above the 3% growth split sit at 6.1x. The five below that split sit at 3.7x, showing an association rather than a single valuation rule. 3 Growth Without the Higher Margin Can Still Stand Out On the 10 names with growth and margin data, the three clearing both bars sit at 4.3x. The two clearing only the growth bar sit at 9.3x, alongside differing footprint and investment profiles. 4 Transaction Benchmarks Vary with What Buyers Acquire Of the 9 transactions shown with disclosed terms, the structures span whole companies, regional footprints and focused operating assets. Observed EV / EBITDA benchmarks range from 5.3x to 14.8x, reinforcing the need to match earnings quality and asset scope. 5.0x Sector median EV/EBITDA CY2027E consensus · 10 rated of 12 companies 9.1x Premium end EV/EBITDA vs 3.2x at the discount end top quartile (n=3) against bottom quartile (n=2) on EV/EBITDA — the spread the report explains 39 Transactions with disclosed terms 133 recorded in this tier · 3 told as case studies, the full list in the appendix

  4. 04
    SECTION 02

    02

    02.

    Section 02 of 06 — One Operator Model Still Produces Widely Different Outcomes. Network footprint, customer quality and investment needs distinguish companies within the same sector. Use this divider to reset the room before the section's pages; the progress dots show where the argument stands. 4

    Everything on this page

    SECTION 02 02 THE LANDSCAPE One Operator Model Still Produces Widely Different Outcomes Network footprint, customer quality and investment needs distinguish companies within the same sector. 02 of 06 Integrated Telecommunication Services Coverage | September 2026 | Confidential | Not investment advice Sources & methodology 4

  5. 05
    02 · MARKET MAP

    Integrated Operators Share a Label, but Network Economics Set Them Apart

    Integrated Operators Share a Label, but Network Economics Set Them Apart.

    Integrated Operators Share a Label, but Network Economics Set Them Apart 12 approved companies grouped by business segment · median EV / EBITDA (CY2027E) per group · as of 2026-09-28 Source: NeuraCap analytics platform; market data and consensus estimates as of 2026-09-28; company disclosures via SEC EDGAR where linked. Segment grouping follows the platform's classification; group medians on rated names only. "Why it matters" lines are NeuraCap views. 5

    Everything on this page

    02 · MARKET MAP Integrated Operators Share a Label, but Network Economics Set Them Apart 12 approved companies grouped by business segment · median EV / EBITDA (CY2027E) per group · as of 2026-09-28 Source: NeuraCap analytics platform; market data and consensus estimates as of 2026-09-28; company disclosures via SEC EDGAR where linked. Segment grouping follows the platform's classification; group medians on rated names only. "Why it matters" lines are NeuraCap views. Integrated Telecommunication Services Coverage | September 2026 | Confidential | Not investment advice Sources & methodology 5 INTEGRATED TELECOM OPERATORS 12 cos median 5.0x Verizon (VZ) Comcast Holdings (CCZ) Chunghwa Telecom (CHT) Millicom (TIGO) Telefônica (VIV) KT Liberty Global (LBTYK) Telecom (TEO) Cable One (CABO) GCI Liberty (GLIBA) Shenandoah (SHEN) ATN International (ATNI) The group combines recurring service revenue with materially different footprints, customer trends and network investment needs.

  6. 06
    02 · LANDSCAPE

    The Sector Is Concentrated in One Model but Diverse in Operating Quality

    The Sector Is Concentrated in One Model but Diverse in Operating Quality.

    The Sector Is Concentrated in One Model but Diverse in Operating Quality Segment view of the approved universe · EV / EBITDA (CY2027E) medians on rated names · as of 2026-09-28 Source: NeuraCap analytics platform; market data and consensus estimates as of 2026-09-28; company disclosures via SEC EDGAR where linked. "What they do / why it matters" is a NeuraCap view. Full company-level detail in the appendix and companion tables. 6

    Everything on this page

    02 · LANDSCAPE The Sector Is Concentrated in One Model but Diverse in Operating Quality Segment view of the approved universe · EV / EBITDA (CY2027E) medians on rated names · as of 2026-09-28 Source: NeuraCap analytics platform; market data and consensus estimates as of 2026-09-28; company disclosures via SEC EDGAR where linked. "What they do / why it matters" is a NeuraCap view. Full company-level detail in the appendix and companion tables. Integrated Telecommunication Services Coverage | September 2026 | Confidential | Not investment advice Sources & methodology 6 Segment n Share of universe Median EV/EBITDA Names to know What they do — and why it matters Integrated telecom operators 12 100% 5.0x Verizon Communications Inc. (VZ) · Comcast Holdings Corp. (CCZ) · +10 more Scale needs operating proof. The sole classification shown accounts for 100% of the approved companies. Value still depends on broadband net additions, subscriber churn, service revenue mix and the capital required to protect the network.

  7. 07
    SECTION 03

    03

    03.

    Section 03 of 06 — Forward Valuations Separate as Growth and Durability Diverge. The premium remains visible after forecast earnings are already reflected. Use this divider to reset the room before the section's pages; the progress dots show where the argument stands. 7

    Everything on this page

    SECTION 03 03 VALUATION & SITUATIONS Forward Valuations Separate as Growth and Durability Diverge The premium remains visible after forecast earnings are already reflected. 03 of 06 Integrated Telecommunication Services Coverage | September 2026 | Confidential | Not investment advice Sources & methodology 7

  8. 08
    03 · PUBLIC MARKET VALUATION

    Forward Valuations Separate Sharply Across Integrated Operators

    Forward Valuations Separate Sharply Across Integrated Operators.

    Forward Valuations Separate Sharply Across Integrated Operators EV / EBITDA (CY2027E) · all 10 rated companies, sorted descending · sector median 5.0x · as of 2026-09-28 Source: NeuraCap analytics platform; market data and consensus estimates as of 2026-09-28; company disclosures via SEC EDGAR where linked. Primary valuation basis: EV / EBITDA on CY2027E consensus (10 of 12 companies eligible; multiples failing the platform's plausibility gates are excluded, never plotted). Tier zones are NeuraCap groupings cut at the rated set's quartiles; every multiple quoted on this page is a median on the same EV / EBITDA (CY2027E) basis. Panel commentary is a NeuraCap view. 8

    Everything on this page

    03 · PUBLIC MARKET VALUATION Forward Valuations Separate Sharply Across Integrated Operators EV / EBITDA (CY2027E) · all 10 rated companies, sorted descending · sector median 5.0x · as of 2026-09-28 Source: NeuraCap analytics platform; market data and consensus estimates as of 2026-09-28; company disclosures via SEC EDGAR where linked. Primary valuation basis: EV / EBITDA on CY2027E consensus (10 of 12 companies eligible; multiples failing the platform's plausibility gates are excluded, never plotted). Tier zones are NeuraCap groupings cut at the rated set's quartiles; every multiple quoted on this page is a median on the same EV / EBITDA (CY2027E) basis. Panel commentary is a NeuraCap view. Integrated Telecommunication Services Coverage | September 2026 | Confidential | Not investment advice Sources & methodology 8 PREMIUM · median 9.1x CORE · median 4.3x DISCOUNT · median 3.2x Sector median 5.0x WHAT SEPARATES THE TWO ENDS The range remains wide. The premium end sits at 9.1x, while the discount end sits at 3.2x. That spread leaves room for company-specific views on footprint quality, customer trends and investment needs. Forward pricing raises the bar. A forward multiple already credits forecast earnings. A premium that remains can signal confidence in the durability of service revenue and network economics. Capital needs still matter. Lease treatment, spectrum obligations, legacy copper and network upgrades can change how similar reported earnings translate into value.

  9. 09
    03 · VALUATION DRIVERS

    Faster Growth Is Associated with Higher Forward Valuation

    Faster Growth Is Associated with Higher Forward Valuation.

    Faster Growth Is Associated with Higher Forward Valuation Median EV / EBITDA (CY2027E) by revenue-growth cohort and by EBITDA-margin cohort (each split at its covered median) · rated names with estimates · as of 2026-09-28 Source: NeuraCap analytics platform; market data and consensus estimates as of 2026-09-28; company disclosures via SEC EDGAR where linked. Cohort medians on rated names with the required estimates (faster n=5; slower n=5; higher-margin n=5; lower-margin n=5). Driver readings are NeuraCap views on the supplied data — association, not causation. 9

    Everything on this page

    03 · VALUATION DRIVERS Faster Growth Is Associated with Higher Forward Valuation Median EV / EBITDA (CY2027E) by revenue-growth cohort and by EBITDA-margin cohort (each split at its covered median) · rated names with estimates · as of 2026-09-28 Source: NeuraCap analytics platform; market data and consensus estimates as of 2026-09-28; company disclosures via SEC EDGAR where linked. Cohort medians on rated names with the required estimates (faster n=5; slower n=5; higher-margin n=5; lower-margin n=5). Driver readings are NeuraCap views on the supplied data — association, not causation. Integrated Telecommunication Services Coverage | September 2026 | Confidential | Not investment advice Sources & methodology 9 EV/EBITDA, median per cohort · growth split at 3% · EBITDA-margin split at 39% The Growth Split Is Visible Across the Peer Set Among the 10 companies with an estimate, the five above 3% growth sit at 6.1x versus 3.7x for the five below. The relationship is observed in this sample and does not establish causation. Durability Matters After Forecasts Are Reflected Forward EV / EBITDA already incorporates expected earnings. Subscriber churn, service revenue quality and pricing discipline help frame whether the resulting valuation can hold. Network Investment Changes the Earnings Read Fiber take-up, network penetration and maintenance capital needs distinguish earnings that can support growth from earnings that require continued reinvestment.

  10. 10
    03 · SITUATION MAP

    Growth and Valuation Divide the Peer Set into Four Owner Agendas

    Growth and Valuation Divide the Peer Set into Four Owner Agendas.

    Growth and Valuation Divide the Peer Set into Four Owner Agendas Cut on EV / EBITDA vs the sector median (5.0x) (rows) and revenue growth vs the covered median (3%) (columns) · observations, not recommendations Source: NeuraCap analytics platform; market data and consensus estimates as of 2026-09-28; company disclosures via SEC EDGAR where linked. Situation boundaries are the cohort's own medians (Directional, NeuraCap view). This page characterises situations; it does not recommend buying or selling any security. 10

    Everything on this page

    03 · SITUATION MAP Growth and Valuation Divide the Peer Set into Four Owner Agendas Cut on EV / EBITDA vs the sector median (5.0x) (rows) and revenue growth vs the covered median (3%) (columns) · observations, not recommendations Source: NeuraCap analytics platform; market data and consensus estimates as of 2026-09-28; company disclosures via SEC EDGAR where linked. Situation boundaries are the cohort's own medians (Directional, NeuraCap view). This page characterises situations; it does not recommend buying or selling any security. Integrated Telecommunication Services Coverage | September 2026 | Confidential | Not investment advice Sources & methodology 10 Premium with Growth Above-median multiple · above-median revenue growth 3 names Millicom International Cellular S.A. (TIGO) · Liberty Global plc (LBTYK) · Shenandoah Telecommunications Company (SHEN) Millicom International Cellular S.A. [TIGO], Liberty Global plc [LBTYK] and Shenandoah Telecommunications Company [SHEN] combine above-middle growth with above-middle valuation. The operating question is whether penetration, retention and pricing can sustain that standing. Premium Without Growth Above-median multiple · below-median revenue growth 2 names Verizon Communications Inc. (VZ) · ATN International, Inc. (ATNI) Verizon Communications Inc. [VZ] and ATN International, Inc. [ATNI] hold above-middle valuation despite below-middle growth. The focus is on earnings durability, customer quality and disciplined network investment. Growth Awaiting Recognition Below-median multiple · above-median revenue growth 2 names Telefônica Brasil S.A. (VIV) · Cable One, Inc. (CABO) Telefônica Brasil S.A. [VIV] and Cable One, Inc. [CABO] show above-middle growth with below-middle valuation. The gap places attention on capital intensity, confidence in forecasts and the durability of subscriber trends. Value Under Pressure Below-median multiple · below-median revenue growth 3 names KT Corporation (KT) · Telecom Argentina S.A. (TEO) · GCI Liberty, Inc. (GLIBA) KT Corporation [KT], Telecom Argentina S.A. [TEO] and GCI Liberty, Inc. [GLIBA] sit below the middle on both measures. The operating agenda centers on retention, service mix, pricing and capital allocation.

  11. 11
    03 · GROWTH VS PROFITABILITY

    Higher Valuation Travels with Growth More than Margin in This Sample

    Higher Valuation Travels with Growth More than Margin in This Sample.

    Higher Valuation Travels with Growth More than Margin in This Sample Revenue growth (CY2027E, x-axis) vs EBITDA margin (CY2027E, y-axis) · 10 companies with both estimates · cuts at the covered medians (3% growth, 39% margin) · median EV/EBITDA per quadrant · as of 2026-09-28 Source: NeuraCap analytics platform; market data and consensus estimates as of 2026-09-28; company disclosures via SEC EDGAR where linked. Quadrant cuts are the covered set's medians. Quadrant medians on names with a meaningful EV/EBITDA (balanced n=3; margin-only n=2; growth-only n=2; neither n=3). 11

    Everything on this page

    03 · GROWTH VS PROFITABILITY Higher Valuation Travels with Growth More than Margin in This Sample Revenue growth (CY2027E, x-axis) vs EBITDA margin (CY2027E, y-axis) · 10 companies with both estimates · cuts at the covered medians (3% growth, 39% margin) · median EV/EBITDA per quadrant · as of 2026-09-28 Source: NeuraCap analytics platform; market data and consensus estimates as of 2026-09-28; company disclosures via SEC EDGAR where linked. Quadrant cuts are the covered set's medians. Quadrant medians on names with a meaningful EV/EBITDA (balanced n=3; margin-only n=2; growth-only n=2; neither n=3). Integrated Telecommunication Services Coverage | September 2026 | Confidential | Not investment advice Sources & methodology 11 2.0% 3.0% 4.0% 5.0% 6.0% 20% 30% 40% 50% MARGIN ONLY median 3.2x BALANCED median 4.3x NEITHER median 5.8x GROWTH ONLY median 9.3x VZ ATNI KT TEO GLIBA LBTYK TIGO SHEN VIV CABO x: revenue growth (CY2027E) · y: EBITDA margin (CY2027E) HOW TO READ THIS The chart covers 10 names with both growth and margin data. The three names above both bars sit at 4.3x, while the two growth-only names sit at 9.3x. The two margin-only names sit at 3.2x, and the three below both bars sit at 5.8x. These small groups show association and leave company-specific network economics important. Rule of 40 (revenue growth + EBITDA margin ≥ 40%): 7 of 10 names clear it.

  12. 12
    03 · THE AGENDA

    Strategic Focus Requires a Choice Among Growth, Revenue Durability and Capital Deployment

    Strategic Focus Requires a Choice Among Growth, Revenue Durability and Capital Deployment.

    Strategic Focus Requires a Choice Among Growth, Revenue Durability and Capital Deployment NeuraCap view · framed as the questions an owner or acquirer should resolve · observations, not recommendations Source: NeuraCap analytics platform; market data and consensus estimates as of 2026-09-28; company disclosures via SEC EDGAR where linked. All content on this page is Directional — NeuraCap advisory judgment grounded in the cohort data shown earlier. It does not constitute investment advice. 12

    Everything on this page

    03 · THE AGENDA Strategic Focus Requires a Choice Among Growth, Revenue Durability and Capital Deployment NeuraCap view · framed as the questions an owner or acquirer should resolve · observations, not recommendations Source: NeuraCap analytics platform; market data and consensus estimates as of 2026-09-28; company disclosures via SEC EDGAR where linked. All content on this page is Directional — NeuraCap advisory judgment grounded in the cohort data shown earlier. It does not constitute investment advice. Integrated Telecommunication Services Coverage | September 2026 | Confidential | Not investment advice Sources & methodology 12 Deepen the Customer Relationship Fixed-mobile convergence, lower subscriber churn and a richer service revenue mix can strengthen the durability of household economics. What changes the answer: The answer changes when bundle adoption improves retention without relying on heavier promotion. Convert Fiber into Penetration Homes passed create value when fiber take-up, network penetration and average revenue per user support the investment case. What changes the answer: The answer changes when take-up and customer economics begin to cover the required network investment. Rework the Capital Burden Infrastructure sharing or separation may improve capital efficiency where passive assets can be isolated without weakening service differentiation. What changes the answer: The answer changes when shared economics outweigh execution, regulatory and service-control constraints. Match Expansion to Buyer Logic Footprint expansion, focused asset purchases and whole-company combinations serve different strategic needs and carry different regulatory demands. What changes the answer: The answer changes with geographic overlap, financing certainty and the ability to integrate customers and networks.

  13. 13
    SECTION 04

    04

    04.

    Section 04 of 06 — Buyers Are Pursuing Whole Companies, Footprints and Focused Assets. Transaction benchmarks depend on the earnings acquired and the network investment still required. Use this divider to reset the room before the section's pages; the progress dots show where the argument stands. 13

    Everything on this page

    SECTION 04 04 PRECEDENT TRANSACTIONS Buyers Are Pursuing Whole Companies, Footprints and Focused Assets Transaction benchmarks depend on the earnings acquired and the network investment still required. 04 of 06 Integrated Telecommunication Services Coverage | September 2026 | Confidential | Not investment advice Sources & methodology 13

  14. 14
    04 · DEAL CASE STUDIES

    Transaction Values Shift with Asset Scope and Earnings Quality

    Transaction Values Shift with Asset Scope and Earnings Quality.

    Transaction Values Shift with Asset Scope and Earnings Quality 3 of 39 transactions with disclosed terms, told as case studies · multiples on LTM financials at announcement where disclosed · the complete list is in the appendix · as of 2026-09-28 Source: NeuraCap analytics platform; market data and consensus estimates as of 2026-09-28; company disclosures via SEC EDGAR where linked. 109 precedent record(s) carry data-quality flags (deal value unit unresolved; divestiture roles reassigned; duplicate precedent id); figures are shown as recorded in the filing. 94 recorded transactions with neither a disclosed value nor a multiple are omitted from the precedent list and the case studies (kept in the companion workbook). Deal multiples are LTM at announcement (Definitive, from filings); they are not directly comparable to the CY2027E public basis and no spread is claimed.

    Everything on this page

    04 · DEAL CASE STUDIES Transaction Values Shift with Asset Scope and Earnings Quality 3 of 39 transactions with disclosed terms, told as case studies · multiples on LTM financials at announcement where disclosed · the complete list is in the appendix · as of 2026-09-28 Source: NeuraCap analytics platform; market data and consensus estimates as of 2026-09-28; company disclosures via SEC EDGAR where linked. 109 precedent record(s) carry data-quality flags (deal value unit unresolved; divestiture roles reassigned; duplicate precedent id); figures are shown as recorded in the filing. 94 recorded transactions with neither a disclosed value nor a multiple are omitted from the precedent list and the case studies (kept in the companion workbook). Deal multiples are LTM at announcement (Definitive, from filings); they are not directly comparable to the CY2027E public basis and no spread is claimed. "Why the deal happened" is a NeuraCap read of the recorded evidence. Integrated Telecommunication Services Coverage | September 2026 | Confidential | Not investment advice Sources & methodology 14 Sep-2024 $19.6B Verizon Communications Inc. Verizon Communications Inc. [VZ] reached for Frontier Communications Parent, Inc. to expand… EV / LTM revenue 3.4x EV / LTM EBITDA 9.2x WHY THE DEAL HAPPENED The pairing of two telecom operators suggests a footprint-consolidation logic. Frontier Communications Parent, Inc. adds fixed-network assets and customer relationships to Verizon Communications Inc. [VZ]. HOW THE TARGET WAS VALUED The disclosed value was $19.6B, equal to 3.4x revenue and 9.2x EV / EBITDA. The earnings benchmark sits above the middle of the listed peer range. Sep-2024 $14.8B Charter Communications, Inc. Charter Communications, Inc. brought Liberty Broadband Corporation into a more direct corporate… EV / LTM revenue 15.1x EV / LTM EBITDA n/a WHY THE DEAL HAPPENED The transaction suggests a strategic fit between an integrated cable operator and a closely related corporate interest. That alignment distinguishes it from a purchase of a standalone operating footprint. HOW THE TARGET WAS VALUED The disclosed value was $14.8B at 15.1x revenue. The revenue benchmark should be read in the context of the target's corporate structure rather than as a broad operating-company reference. Jun-2024 $9.8B Atlas Luxco S.à r.l. Atlas Luxco S.à r.l. pursued Millicom International Cellular S.A. [TIGO] as a whole-company investment. EV / LTM revenue 1.7x EV / LTM EBITDA n/a WHY THE DEAL HAPPENED The pairing suggests an ownership case built around recurring telecom earnings and a regional operating footprint. Whole-company scope also brings network investment, financing and regulatory considerations into the value assessment. HOW THE TARGET WAS VALUED The disclosed value was $9.8B at 1.7x revenue. The revenue benchmark offers a cross-check where no disclosed EV / EBITDA multiple is shown.

  15. 15
    SECTION 05

    05

    05.

    Section 05 of 06 — Durable Growth Earns Attention When Network Economics Support It. Pricing, retention, service mix and capital intensity frame the value discussion. Use this divider to reset the room before the section's pages; the progress dots show where the argument stands. 15

    Everything on this page

    SECTION 05 05 STRATEGIC IMPLICATIONS Durable Growth Earns Attention When Network Economics Support It Pricing, retention, service mix and capital intensity frame the value discussion. 05 of 06 Integrated Telecommunication Services Coverage | September 2026 | Confidential | Not investment advice Sources & methodology 15

  16. 16
    05 · STRATEGIC IMPLICATIONS

    Higher Value Is Associated with Growth, Customer Quality and Network Economics

    Higher Value Is Associated with Growth, Customer Quality and Network Economics.

    Higher Value Is Associated with Growth, Customer Quality and Network Economics NeuraCap view · the questions this data puts on the table for the next twelve months Source: NeuraCap analytics platform; market data and consensus estimates as of 2026-09-28; company disclosures via SEC EDGAR where linked. This page is Directional — NeuraCap views drawn from the analysis in this report. Observations, not recommendations. 16

    Everything on this page

    05 · STRATEGIC IMPLICATIONS Higher Value Is Associated with Growth, Customer Quality and Network Economics NeuraCap view · the questions this data puts on the table for the next twelve months Source: NeuraCap analytics platform; market data and consensus estimates as of 2026-09-28; company disclosures via SEC EDGAR where linked. This page is Directional — NeuraCap views drawn from the analysis in this report. Observations, not recommendations. Integrated Telecommunication Services Coverage | September 2026 | Confidential | Not investment advice Sources & methodology 16 FOR OWNERS Build Growth Around Durable Customers Prioritize service mix, pricing discipline, lower churn and deeper household relationships. Growth earns a clearer valuation read when it is supported by repeatable customer economics. FOR OPERATORS Make Network Spending Earn Its Place Tie fiber expansion and footprint investment to penetration, take-up and efficient network utilization. Legacy copper and network overbuild can dilute otherwise durable earnings. FOR CAPITAL ALLOCATORS Separate Strategic Fit from Headline Price Whole companies, regional platforms and focused assets carry different earnings quality, capital needs and regulatory exposure. Comparable transaction benchmarks work best when asset scope and obligations align.

  17. 17
    SECTION 06

    06

    06.

    Section 06 of 06 — The Full Universe, Methodology and Sources. Comparables detail behind every figure in the body, the valuation basis, and where each underlying disclosure lives. Use this divider to reset the room before the section's pages; the progress dots show where the argument stands. 17

    Everything on this page

    SECTION 06 06 APPENDIX The Full Universe, Methodology and Sources Comparables detail behind every figure in the body, the valuation basis, and where each underlying disclosure lives. 06 of 06 Integrated Telecommunication Services Coverage | September 2026 | Confidential | Not investment advice Sources & methodology 17

  18. 18
    06 · PUBLIC COMPARABLES (1 OF 1)

    Public Comparables on EV / EBITDA (CY2027E), Grouped by Valuation Tier

    Public Comparables on EV / EBITDA (CY2027E), Grouped by Valuation Tier.

    Public Comparables on EV / EBITDA (CY2027E), Grouped by Valuation Tier Teal shading marks a EV/EBITDA above the sector median (5.0x); amber marks below · 10 rated companies; 2 not rated (no eligible EV/EBITDA) · tickers link to the underlying source · as of 2026-09-28 Source: NeuraCap analytics platform; market data and consensus estimates as of 2026-09-28; company disclosures via SEC EDGAR where linked. All 10 rated rows are in this appendix and in the companion workbook, which carries the complete field set. Names without an eligible multiple are listed in the companion workbook. 18

    Everything on this page

    06 · PUBLIC COMPARABLES (1 OF 1) Public Comparables on EV / EBITDA (CY2027E), Grouped by Valuation Tier Teal shading marks a EV/EBITDA above the sector median (5.0x); amber marks below · 10 rated companies; 2 not rated (no eligible EV/EBITDA) · tickers link to the underlying source · as of 2026-09-28 Source: NeuraCap analytics platform; market data and consensus estimates as of 2026-09-28; company disclosures via SEC EDGAR where linked. All 10 rated rows are in this appendix and in the companion workbook, which carries the complete field set. Names without an eligible multiple are listed in the companion workbook. Integrated Telecommunication Services Coverage | September 2026 | Confidential | Not investment advice Sources & methodology 18 Company Ticker Segment EV EV/EBITDA (CY2027E) Rev growth EBITDA margin Rule of 40 PREMIUM — ≥6.7x · median 9.1x · 3 companies Liberty Global plc LBTYK Integrated telecom operators $11.5B 9.4x 4% 25% 28 Shenandoah Telecommunications Company SHEN Integrated telecom operators $1.4B 9.1x 5% 38% 44 Verizon Communications Inc. VZ Integrated telecom operators $384B 7.0x 2% 38% 40 CORE — 3.6x–6.7x · median 4.3x · 5 companies Millicom International Cellular S.A. TIGO Integrated telecom operators $25.7B 6.1x 4% 46% 50 ATN International, Inc. ATNI Integrated telecom operators $1.1B 5.8x 2% 25% 27 Cable One, Inc. CABO Integrated telecom operators $3.0B 4.3x 6% 47% 53 KT Corporation KT Integrated telecom operators $15.3B 3.7x 2% 18% 20 Telefônica Brasil S.A. VIV Integrated telecom operators $20.1B 3.6x 6% 43% 48 DISCOUNT — <3.6x · median 3.2x · 2 companies GCI Liberty, Inc. GLIBA Integrated telecom operators $1.5B 3.6x 3% 39% 42 Telecom Argentina S.A. TEO Integrated telecom operators $8.8B 2.9x 2% 43% 46

  19. 19
    06 · PRECEDENT TRANSACTIONS (1 OF 2)

    All Precedent Transactions with Disclosed Terms, Newest First

    All Precedent Transactions with Disclosed Terms, Newest First.

    All Precedent Transactions with Disclosed Terms, Newest First 39 transactions with disclosed terms in this tier (133 recorded) · multiples on LTM financials at announcement where disclosed · deal values link to the underlying filing · as of 2026-09-28 Source: NeuraCap analytics platform; market data and consensus estimates as of 2026-09-28; company disclosures via SEC EDGAR where linked. 109 precedent record(s) carry data-quality flags (deal value unit unresolved; divestiture roles reassigned; duplicate precedent id); figures are shown as recorded in the filing. 94 recorded transactions with neither a disclosed value nor a multiple are omitted from the precedent list and the case studies (kept in the companion workbook). Deal multiples are LTM at announcement (Definitive, from filings); they are not directly comparable to the CY2027E public basis and no spread is claimed.

    Everything on this page

    06 · PRECEDENT TRANSACTIONS (1 OF 2) All Precedent Transactions with Disclosed Terms, Newest First 39 transactions with disclosed terms in this tier (133 recorded) · multiples on LTM financials at announcement where disclosed · deal values link to the underlying filing · as of 2026-09-28 Source: NeuraCap analytics platform; market data and consensus estimates as of 2026-09-28; company disclosures via SEC EDGAR where linked. 109 precedent record(s) carry data-quality flags (deal value unit unresolved; divestiture roles reassigned; duplicate precedent id); figures are shown as recorded in the filing. 94 recorded transactions with neither a disclosed value nor a multiple are omitted from the precedent list and the case studies (kept in the companion workbook). Deal multiples are LTM at announcement (Definitive, from filings); they are not directly comparable to the CY2027E public basis and no spread is claimed. 18 of 39 transactions shown; the rest are in the companion workbook. Integrated Telecommunication Services Coverage | September 2026 | Confidential | Not investment advice Sources & methodology 19 Date Transaction EV EV/LTM Rev EV/LTM EBITDA Why it matters May-2026 John C. Malone → Liberty Latin America Ltd. $9.1B 2.0x 5.3x John C. Malone agreed to acquire Liberty Latin America Ltd. at $9.1B and 2.0x revenue. The transaction also carried a disclosed EV / EBITDA benchmark. Aug-2025 Bandit Parent, LP → WideOpenWest, Inc. $1.5B 2.4x 5.3x Bandit Parent, LP agreed to acquire WideOpenWest, Inc. for $1.5B and 2.4x revenue. The structure points to continued interest in recurring broadband earnings. May-2025 Millicom International Cellular S.A. → Telefónica Móviles del Uruguay S.A. $440M n/a n/a Millicom International Cellular S.A. [TIGO] agreed to acquire Telefónica Móviles del Uruguay S.A. for $440M. The pairing suggests a focus on footprint expansion within telecom operations. May-2025 Charter Communications, Inc. → commercial fiber and managed IT and cloud services businesses of Cox Communications, LLC n/a n/a 6.4x Charter Communications, Inc. completed the acquisition of commercial fiber and managed IT and cloud services businesses of Cox Communications, LLC at 6.4x EV / EBITDA. The asset scope centers the benchmark on enterprise connectivity and managed services earnings. Sep-2024 Charter Communications, Inc. → Liberty Broadband Corporation $14.8B 15.1x n/a Charter Communications, Inc. completed the acquisition of Liberty Broadband Corporation. The transaction paired an integrated operator with a closely related corporate interest. Sep-2024 Verizon Communications Inc. → Frontier Communications Parent, Inc. $19.6B 3.4x 9.2x Verizon Communications Inc. [VZ] agreed to acquire Frontier Communications Parent, Inc. The combination suggests a strategic focus on fixed-network footprint and customer reach. Jul-2024 Millicom International Cellular S.A. → Telefonica Colombia (Coltel) $1.0B n/a n/a Millicom International Cellular S.A. [TIGO] agreed to acquire Telefonica Colombia (Coltel) for $1.0B. The transaction suggests continued interest in expanding an existing regional operating footprint. Jun-2024 Atlas Luxco S.à r.l. → Millicom International Cellular S.A. $9.8B 1.7x n/a Atlas Luxco S.à r.l. agreed to acquire Millicom International Cellular S.A. [TIGO]. The structure points to investor interest in an integrated regional operator. May-2024 Lew’s Holdings Corporation → Vodafone Spain and Vodafone Italy n/a n/a 14.8x Lew’s Holdings Corporation agreed to acquire Vodafone Spain and Vodafone Italy at 14.8x EV / EBITDA. The benchmark reflects the specific scope and earnings attached to the country operations.

  20. 20
    06 · PRECEDENT TRANSACTIONS (2 OF 2)

    All Precedent Transactions with Disclosed Terms, Newest First

    All Precedent Transactions with Disclosed Terms, Newest First.

    All Precedent Transactions with Disclosed Terms, Newest First 39 transactions with disclosed terms in this tier (133 recorded) · multiples on LTM financials at announcement where disclosed · deal values link to the underlying filing · as of 2026-09-28 Source: NeuraCap analytics platform; market data and consensus estimates as of 2026-09-28; company disclosures via SEC EDGAR where linked. 109 precedent record(s) carry data-quality flags (deal value unit unresolved; divestiture roles reassigned; duplicate precedent id); figures are shown as recorded in the filing. 94 recorded transactions with neither a disclosed value nor a multiple are omitted from the precedent list and the case studies (kept in the companion workbook). Deal multiples are LTM at announcement (Definitive, from filings); they are not directly comparable to the CY2027E public basis and no spread is claimed.

    Everything on this page

    06 · PRECEDENT TRANSACTIONS (2 OF 2) All Precedent Transactions with Disclosed Terms, Newest First 39 transactions with disclosed terms in this tier (133 recorded) · multiples on LTM financials at announcement where disclosed · deal values link to the underlying filing · as of 2026-09-28 Source: NeuraCap analytics platform; market data and consensus estimates as of 2026-09-28; company disclosures via SEC EDGAR where linked. 109 precedent record(s) carry data-quality flags (deal value unit unresolved; divestiture roles reassigned; duplicate precedent id); figures are shown as recorded in the filing. 94 recorded transactions with neither a disclosed value nor a multiple are omitted from the precedent list and the case studies (kept in the companion workbook). Deal multiples are LTM at announcement (Definitive, from filings); they are not directly comparable to the CY2027E public basis and no spread is claimed. 18 of 39 transactions shown; the rest are in the companion workbook. Integrated Telecommunication Services Coverage | September 2026 | Confidential | Not investment advice Sources & methodology 20 Date Transaction EV EV/LTM Rev EV/LTM EBITDA Why it matters Oct-2023 Zegona Communications plc → Vodafone Spain n/a n/a 5.3x Nov-2021 Vodacom Group Limited → Vodafone Egypt n/a n/a 7.3x Aug-2021 Apollo Global Management, Inc. → Lumen Technologies, Inc. n/a n/a 5.5x Value shown as recorded in the filing; deal value unit unresolved. Jul-2021 ATN International, Inc. → Alaska Communications n/a n/a 5.0x Value shown as recorded in the filing; deal value unit unresolved. Mar-2021 Rogers Communications Inc. → Shaw Communications Inc. $26.0B n/a n/a Feb-2021 Cable One, Inc. → Hargray Acquisition Holdings, LLC $2.2B n/a n/a Aug-2020 Thoma Bravo → TPG Telecom Limited $1.7B 3.9x 22.9x Value shown as recorded in the filing; deal value unit unresolved. Jan-2020 Grain Management, LLC → Summit Vista, Inc., dba Summit Broadband n/a n/a 15.1x Dec-2019 Brookfield Infrastructure Partners L.P. → Cincinnati Bell Inc. $2.4B 1.6x 7.2x Value shown as recorded in the filing; deal value unit unresolved.

  21. 21
    06 · METHODOLOGY

    Sources, Assumptions and Data Quality

    Sources, Assumptions and Data Quality.

    Sources, Assumptions and Data Quality How this report was built, what was excluded, and where every underlying disclosure lives · as of 2026-09-28 Every figure in this report links to the record it was taken from. Where a figure has no link, the appendix names its source and the basis on which it was read. 21

    Everything on this page

    06 · METHODOLOGY Sources, Assumptions and Data Quality How this report was built, what was excluded, and where every underlying disclosure lives · as of 2026-09-28 Every figure in this report links to the record it was taken from. Where a figure has no link, the appendix names its source and the basis on which it was read. Integrated Telecommunication Services Coverage | September 2026 | Confidential | Not investment advice 21 VALUATION BASIS Primary valuation basis: EV / EBITDA on CY2027E consensus (10 of 12 companies eligible; multiples failing the platform's plausibility gates are excluded, never plotted). EV / EBITDA on CY2027E is the lead convention: it is the sector-appropriate prior for Integrated Telecommunication Services and it clears the coverage gate with 10 of 12 companies (83%). EV / Revenue, P / E are carried as a cross-check. The set earns: 10 of the 10 companies with a reported forward EBITDA carry a meaningful one, so the profit multiple leads and a revenue multiple would understate what the market is pricing. DATA QUALITY & EXCLUSIONS 17 records were excluded or quarantined by the platform's validation gates (unit errors, implausible ratios, ineligible securities and classification failures); the full ledger ships in the companion tables and never feeds a statistic in this report. DEFINITIVE VS DIRECTIONAL Definitive content is disclosed or consensus data passed through stated arithmetic. Directional content — tier boundaries, situation cuts, "why it matters" commentary, the agenda pages — is NeuraCap analyst judgment and is labeled as such where it appears. WHAT THIS REPORT IS NOT This report characterises a sector. It does not recommend buying, selling or holding any security, and no statement in it should be read as investment advice or a price target. WHERE THE DATA LIVES 499 registered source documents stand behind the figures in this report. Metric hyperlinks throughout the deck open the specific filing or data record; by publisher: sec.gov (498) · home.treasury.gov (1). The companion workbook beside this deck carries the complete source index.

  22. 22

    Higher Forward Values Sit with Durable Growth and Credible Network Economics.

    Higher Forward Values Sit with Durable Growth and Credible Network Economics..

    Closing — Higher Forward Values Sit with Durable Growth and Credible Network Economics. The companion tables beside this deck carry the full universe, the exclusion ledger and the complete source index for any figure a client wants to trace. 22

    Everything on this page

    Higher Forward Values Sit with Durable Growth and Credible Network Economics. NeuraCap AI — Integrated Telecommunication Services Coverage September 2026 · Prepared by NeuraCap AI · Confidential Integrated Telecommunication Services Coverage | September 2026 | Confidential | Not investment advice Sources & methodology 22

Sources and methodology

This report covers Integrated Telecommunication Services (Communication Services › Telecommunication Services › Integrated Telecommunication Services) with market data and consensus estimates as of September 28, 2026. The company universe is the 12 listed companies whose core business is Integrated Telecommunication Services according to NeuraCap's industry classification of each company's reported business segments (a company is included only when this industry is central to what it does, not merely adjacent to it). Companies in the set: ATN International, Inc. (ATNI), Cable One, Inc. (CABO), Comcast Holdings Corp. (CCZ), Chunghwa Telecom Co., Ltd. (CHT), GCI Liberty, Inc. (GLIBA), KT Corporation (KT), Liberty Global plc (LBTYK), Shenandoah Telecommunications Company (SHEN), Telecom Argentina S.A. (TEO), Millicom International Cellular S.A. (TIGO), Telefônica Brasil S.A. (VIV), Verizon Communications Inc. (VZ). The market map groups them by business vertical — Integrated telecom operators: 12 companies (VZ, CCZ, CHT, TIGO, VIV, KT, LBTYK, TEO, CABO, GLIBA, SHEN, ATNI). 10 of the 12 companies carry a valid multiple on the primary valuation basis and form the rated set behind every cohort statistic; the others are shown but do not enter the statistics.

Scope and company universe

This report covers Integrated Telecommunication Services (Communication Services › Telecommunication Services › Integrated Telecommunication Services) with market data and consensus estimates as of September 28, 2026. The company universe is the 12 listed companies whose core business is Integrated Telecommunication Services according to NeuraCap's industry classification of each company's reported business segments (a company is included only when this industry is central to what it does, not merely adjacent to it). Companies in the set: ATN International, Inc. (ATNI), Cable One, Inc. (CABO), Comcast Holdings Corp. (CCZ), Chunghwa Telecom Co., Ltd. (CHT), GCI Liberty, Inc. (GLIBA), KT Corporation (KT), Liberty Global plc (LBTYK), Shenandoah Telecommunications Company (SHEN), Telecom Argentina S.A. (TEO), Millicom International Cellular S.A. (TIGO), Telefônica Brasil S.A. (VIV), Verizon Communications Inc. (VZ). The market map groups them by business vertical — Integrated telecom operators: 12 companies (VZ, CCZ, CHT, TIGO, VIV, KT, LBTYK, TEO, CABO, GLIBA, SHEN, ATNI). 10 of the 12 companies carry a valid multiple on the primary valuation basis and form the rated set behind every cohort statistic; the others are shown but do not enter the statistics.

What was excluded and why

17 records failed a validation gate and never feed a statistic in this report (1 excluded from universe; 16 excluded from aggregate). Each exclusion, with its reason: CMCSA — The same issuer is already represented by CCZ; counting both would double-weight one business in every median and every regression (effect: excluded from universe) · ATNI — Non-positive EPS; P/E is n/m (effect: excluded from aggregate) · ATNI — Non-positive EPS; P/E is n/m (effect: excluded from aggregate) · CABO — Non-positive EPS; P/E is n/m (effect: excluded from aggregate) · CABO — Non-positive EPS; P/E is n/m (effect: excluded from aggregate) · CABO — Non-positive EPS; P/E is n/m (effect: excluded from aggregate) · GLIBA — Non-positive EPS; P/E is n/m (effect: excluded from aggregate) · GLIBA — Non-positive EPS; P/E is n/m (effect: excluded from aggregate) · LBTYK — Non-positive EPS; P/E is n/m (effect: excluded from aggregate) · LBTYK — Non-positive EPS; P/E is n/m (effect: excluded from aggregate) · LBTYK — Non-positive EPS; P/E is n/m (effect: excluded from aggregate) · LBTYK — Non-positive EPS; P/E is n/m (effect: excluded from aggregate) · SHEN — Non-positive EPS; P/E is n/m (effect: excluded from aggregate) · SHEN — Non-positive EPS; P/E is n/m (effect: excluded from aggregate) · SHEN — Non-positive EPS; P/E is n/m (effect: excluded from aggregate) · SHEN — Non-positive EPS; P/E is n/m (effect: excluded from aggregate) · TEO — Non-positive EPS; P/E is n/m (effect: excluded from aggregate)

Primary valuation basis and how it was chosen

Primary valuation basis: EV / EBITDA on CY2027E consensus (10 of 12 companies eligible; multiples failing the platform's plausibility gates are excluded, never plotted). EV / EBITDA on CY2027E is the lead convention: it is the sector-appropriate prior for Integrated Telecommunication Services and it clears the coverage gate with 10 of 12 companies (83%). EV / Revenue, P / E are carried as a cross-check. The set earns: 10 of the 10 companies with a reported forward EBITDA carry a meaningful one, so the profit multiple leads and a revenue multiple would understate what the market is pricing. The basis is selected in two steps: the industry's customary valuation conventions set the order of preference, and each convention is then tested for coverage — the share of companies with a valid, plausibility-checked multiple on the chosen period. A convention is used only when enough companies carry it; the best-covered convention is used, and disclosed, when none clears the threshold. Coverage measured for this report — EV / EBITDA: 10 of 12 companies; EV / rEVenue: 11 of 12 companies; P/E: 5 of 12 companies. 2 companies show a non-meaningful P / E denominator and are excluded from that statistic.

How the multiples and statistics are computed

Enterprise value (EV) is market capitalisation at the as-of date plus total debt minus cash and equivalents from the latest reported balance sheet, reconciled against the platform's stored value and disclosed where the two differ. Forward multiples divide EV (or the share price for P/E) by the consensus estimate for the stated calendar period; trailing multiples use the last twelve months of reported figures from SEC filings. A multiple with a negative or immaterial denominator is treated as not meaningful and excluded from every statistic. Cohort statistics are medians and quartiles over the rated set only; a group median with fewer than three observations is shown as the single company's figure and labelled as such. Valuation tiers cut the rated set at its quartiles (tiers cut at the rated set's quartiles: Premium ≥6.7x, Core 3.6x–6.7x, Discount <3.6x — NeuraCap groupings). Revenue growth compares consecutive calendar-year consensus revenue; EBITDA margin divides consensus EBITDA by consensus revenue for the same period. Figures shown in this report and the calculation behind each: 5.0x = median(ev_ebitda CY2027E) (10 rated companies) · 9.1x = median(ev_ebitda CY2027E) within Premium tier (n=3) · 4.3x = median(ev_ebitda CY2027E) within Core tier (n=5) · 3.2x = median(ev_ebitda CY2027E) within Discount tier (n=2) · 6.1x = median(ev_ebitda CY2027E) | growth ≥ 3% (n=5) · 3.7x = median(ev_ebitda CY2027E) | growth < 3% (n=5) · 3.6x = median(ev_ebitda CY2027E) | EBITDA margin ≥ 39% (n=5) · 7.0x = median(ev_ebitda CY2027E) | EBITDA margin < 39% (n=5) · 43% = median Rule of 40 score (revenue growth + EBITDA margin) (n=10) · 4.3x = median(ev_ebitda CY2027E) within balanced quadrant (n=3) · 3.2x = median(ev_ebitda CY2027E) within marginOnly quadrant (n=2) · 9.3x = median(ev_ebitda CY2027E) within growthOnly quadrant (n=2) · 5.8x = median(ev_ebitda CY2027E) within neither quadrant (n=3)

Precedent transactions: what is in the record and why

The precedent record holds the M&A transactions in Integrated Telecommunication Services recorded from SEC filings (8-K announcements and the documents they reference), newest first, with each value and multiple linked to the exact passage in the filing that states it. 133 transactions were recorded for this industry; 39 are shown. 94 recorded transactions with neither a disclosed value nor a multiple are omitted because they say nothing about price; they remain in the companion workbook. Deal multiples are enterprise value over the target's last-twelve-month revenue or EBITDA at announcement, as disclosed; they are not restated to the public basis and no spread to the public multiples is claimed. Before a transaction reaches the record it passes a screen for mirrored or duplicate filings of the same deal, for divestitures where the filer is the seller rather than the buyer, for carve-outs recorded under the parent's name, and for values whose citation describes something other than the price paid (a debt raise, a termination fee); such records are corrected or excluded and the correction is noted. Data-quality notes on this record: 54 × no evidence record; 42 × deal value unit unresolved; 3 × duplicate precedent id; 10 × divestiture roles reassigned. Case studies lead with the 3 richest stories — disclosed value, a readable multiple, newest first.

Sources

Company financials and transaction terms come from the companies' own SEC filings on EDGAR (10-K, 10-Q and 8-K documents), linked from each figure in the report. Forward figures are analyst consensus estimates for the calendar periods shown. Share prices and market capitalisations are market data as of September 28, 2026. Treasury yields are published by the U.S. Department of the Treasury. 503 source documents stand behind this report; by publisher domain: sec.gov, home.treasury.gov (1). Every figure on every page is traceable to one of these records; nothing in the report is derived from outside data.

Interpretation and important notice

Tier labels, situation maps, the agenda and the implications pages are NeuraCap analytical views drawn from the recorded evidence and are labelled as such. The report is informational: it is not investment advice, not a recommendation to buy or sell any security, not an opinion of value and not an offer of any kind. Readers should perform their own diligence before acting on anything described here.

This report is published for information only. It is not a recommendation to buy or sell any security, an offer or solicitation, an appraisal or a fairness opinion, and no fiduciary relationship is created by reading it. Multiples that fail NeuraCap’s plausibility gates are excluded and never plotted. See the full methodology and the disclaimer.

More coverage in Communication Services

Want this analysis for a company in Integrated Telecommunication Services?

Company valuation reports run the same method against a single business — public or private.

Get a free sample reportBrowse the research