Networking Equipment and Services Sector Outlook — September 2026

Read the report

SlidesScroll

1 of 21

←→Full screen

INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY › TECHNOLOGY HARDWARE AND EQUIPMENT › NETWORKING EQUIPMENT AND SERVICES

Networking Equipment and Services: Value Splits by Model

The report shows where public-market value and buyer interest sit across networking business models.

September 2026 · Prepared by NeuraCap AI · Confidential

Market data as of 2026-09-28 · primary valuation basis EV / EBITDA (CY2027E)

Networking Equipment and Services Coverage | September 2026 | Confidential | Not investment advice

Sources & methodology

1

← Previous

1 / 21 · INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY › TECHNOLOGY HARDWARE AND EQUIPMENT › NETWORKING EQUIPMENT AND SERVICES

Next →

What each page shows

The analyst’s walkthrough of the deck, page by page.

1. 01

   INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY › TECHNOLOGY HARDWARE AND EQUIPMENT › NETWORKING EQUIPMENT AND SERVICES

   INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY › TECHNOLOGY HARDWARE AND EQUIPMENT › NETWORKING EQUIPMENT AND SERVICES.

   Cover — Networking Equipment and Services sector insights, September 2026. Prepared by NeuraCap AI; market data as of 2026-09-28; primary valuation basis EV / EBITDA (CY2027E). The framing line carries the deck's finding with the figures stripped. 1

   Everything on this page

   INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY › TECHNOLOGY HARDWARE AND EQUIPMENT › NETWORKING EQUIPMENT AND SERVICES Networking Equipment and Services: Value Splits by Model The report shows where public-market value and buyer interest sit across networking business models. September 2026 · Prepared by NeuraCap AI · Confidential Market data as of 2026-09-28 · primary valuation basis EV / EBITDA (CY2027E) Networking Equipment and Services Coverage | September 2026 | Confidential | Not investment advice Sources & methodology 1

2. 02
   CONTENTS

   What This Report Covers

   What This Report Covers.

   Contents — the report runs 5 numbered sections plus the appendix: the bottom line, the landscape, valuation & situations, precedent transactions, strategic implications. The Bottom Line comes first by design: a reader who stops after section 01 still leaves with the whole story. 2

   Everything on this page

   CONTENTS What This Report Covers 01 The Bottom Line Value Sits with Differentiated Architecture and Durable Software Economics 02 The Landscape Software Economics and Differentiated Hardware Occupy Distinct Positions 03 Valuation & Situations The Premium End Pairs Forecast Delivery with Defensible Positioning 04 Precedent Transactions Buyers Have Paid for Architecture, Channel Access and Broader Coverage 05 Strategic Implications Strengthen the Economics Behind the Story Before Choosing the Next Move 06 Appendix Comparables Detail, Methodology, Sources and Assumptions Networking Equipment and Services Coverage | September 2026 | Confidential | Not investment advice Sources & methodology 2

3. 03
   01 · THE BOTTOM LINE

   Networking Equipment and Services Splits Across Connectivity Equipment, Network Software and Acceleration Hardware

   Networking Equipment and Services Splits Across Connectivity Equipment, Network Software and Acceleration Hardware.

   Networking Equipment and Services Splits Across Connectivity Equipment, Network Software and Acceleration Hardware The full story on one page · figures on EV / EBITDA (CY2027E), market data as of 2026-09-28 Source: NeuraCap analytics platform; market data and consensus estimates as of 2026-09-28; company disclosures via SEC EDGAR where linked. Primary valuation basis: EV / EBITDA on CY2027E consensus (6 of 10 companies eligible; multiples failing the platform's plausibility gates are excluded, never plotted). Qualitative characterisations are NeuraCap views. 3

   Everything on this page

   01 · THE BOTTOM LINE Networking Equipment and Services Splits Across Connectivity Equipment, Network Software and Acceleration Hardware The full story on one page · figures on EV / EBITDA (CY2027E), market data as of 2026-09-28 Source: NeuraCap analytics platform; market data and consensus estimates as of 2026-09-28; company disclosures via SEC EDGAR where linked. Primary valuation basis: EV / EBITDA on CY2027E consensus (6 of 10 companies eligible; multiples failing the platform's plausibility gates are excluded, never plotted). Qualitative characterisations are NeuraCap views. Networking Equipment and Services Coverage | September 2026 | Confidential | Not investment advice Sources & methodology 3 1 Forward Valuation Leaves Little Room for Uneven Delivery The middle of the range is 20.2x across the 6 of 10 companies with a forward EV / EBITDA estimate. A forward multiple already credits forecast growth, so durability matters alongside delivery. 2 Software Economics Hold a Distinct Position Network operating, management and observability software sits at 25.0x in the set. Recurring software, support and subscription revenue remain central to how owners frame revenue quality. 3 Faster Growth Sits with Higher Pricing in This Sample On the 6 companies with a forward EV / EBITDA estimate, the 3 above 11% growth sit at 24.6x. The 3 below the split sit at 15.9x, an observed association rather than a causal conclusion. 4 Transactions Point to Buyer Interest in Architecture and Channel Access Precedent transactions include scaled networking vendors, adjacent infrastructure buyers and sponsors. The pattern suggests continued interest in differentiated architecture, installed-base access and enterprise or service-provider reach. 20.2x Sector median EV/EBITDA CY2027E consensus · 6 rated of 10 companies 33.5x Premium end EV/EBITDA vs 12.3x at the discount end top quartile (n=2) against bottom quartile (n=2) on EV/EBITDA — the spread the report explains 14 Transactions with disclosed terms 33 recorded in this tier · 2 told as case studies, the full list in the appendix

4. 04
   SECTION 02

   02

   02.

   Section 02 of 06 — Software Economics and Differentiated Hardware Occupy Distinct Positions. Revenue mix, architecture and customer exposure shape how owners should frame performance. Use this divider to reset the room before the section's pages; the progress dots show where the argument stands. 4

   Everything on this page

   SECTION 02 02 THE LANDSCAPE Software Economics and Differentiated Hardware Occupy Distinct Positions Revenue mix, architecture and customer exposure shape how owners should frame performance. 02 of 06 Networking Equipment and Services Coverage | September 2026 | Confidential | Not investment advice Sources & methodology 4

5. 05
   02 · MARKET MAP

   Value Sits Across Three Models with Different Economic Proof Points

   Value Sits Across Three Models with Different Economic Proof Points.

   Value Sits Across Three Models with Different Economic Proof Points 10 approved companies grouped by business segment · median EV / EBITDA (CY2027E) per group · as of 2026-09-28 Source: NeuraCap analytics platform; market data and consensus estimates as of 2026-09-28; company disclosures via SEC EDGAR where linked. Segment grouping follows the platform's classification; group medians on rated names only. "Why it matters" lines are NeuraCap views. 5

   Everything on this page

   02 · MARKET MAP Value Sits Across Three Models with Different Economic Proof Points 10 approved companies grouped by business segment · median EV / EBITDA (CY2027E) per group · as of 2026-09-28 Source: NeuraCap analytics platform; market data and consensus estimates as of 2026-09-28; company disclosures via SEC EDGAR where linked. Segment grouping follows the platform's classification; group medians on rated names only. "Why it matters" lines are NeuraCap views. Networking Equipment and Services Coverage | September 2026 | Confidential | Not investment advice Sources & methodology 5 ENTERPRISE AND SERVICE-PROVIDER CONNECTIVITY EQUIPMENT 5 cos median 15.9x Cisco Systems (CSCO) Ubiquiti (UI) Belden (BDC) Extreme Networks (EXTR) Silicom (SILC) Scale, routing and switching exposure, channel reach and refresh cycles define the commercial case. NETWORK OPERATING, MANAGEMENT AND OBSERVABILITY SOFTWARE 4 cos median 25.0x Fortinet (FTNT) F5 (FFIV) A10 Networks (ATEN) Radware (RDWR) Recurring revenue, support economics and the network operating system shape revenue quality. NETWORK ACCELERATION AND CONNECTIVITY HARDWARE 1 cos 31.7x · 1 rated Arista Networks (ANET) Data-center fabric exposure and architecture differentiation place this model apart from broader equipment vendors.

6. 06
   02 · LANDSCAPE

   Business Model Changes the Evidence Owners Need to Defend Value

   Business Model Changes the Evidence Owners Need to Defend Value.

   Business Model Changes the Evidence Owners Need to Defend Value Segment view of the approved universe · EV / EBITDA (CY2027E) medians on rated names · as of 2026-09-28 Source: NeuraCap analytics platform; market data and consensus estimates as of 2026-09-28; company disclosures via SEC EDGAR where linked. "What they do / why it matters" is a NeuraCap view. Full company-level detail in the appendix and companion tables. 6

   Everything on this page

   02 · LANDSCAPE Business Model Changes the Evidence Owners Need to Defend Value Segment view of the approved universe · EV / EBITDA (CY2027E) medians on rated names · as of 2026-09-28 Source: NeuraCap analytics platform; market data and consensus estimates as of 2026-09-28; company disclosures via SEC EDGAR where linked. "What they do / why it matters" is a NeuraCap view. Full company-level detail in the appendix and companion tables. Networking Equipment and Services Coverage | September 2026 | Confidential | Not investment advice Sources & methodology 6 Segment n Share of universe Median EV/EBITDA Names to know What they do — and why it matters Enterprise and service-provider connectivity equipment 5 50% 15.9x Cisco Systems, Inc. (CSCO) · Ubiquiti Inc. (UI) · +3 more Scale meets product-cycle exposure. These vendors serve enterprise and service-provider demand through connectivity equipment. Installed-base reach can support refresh and cross-sell, while channel inventory, component exposure and white-box competition remain important. Network operating, management and observability software 4 40% 25.0x Fortinet, Inc. (FTNT) · F5, Inc. (FFIV) · +2 more Recurring economics sharpen the story. These businesses pair network functions with software, management and observability. Subscription mix, support attach rate and interoperability help distinguish durable revenue from product-cycle demand. Network acceleration and connectivity hardware 1 10% 31.7x n=1 Arista Networks, Inc. (ANET) Architecture carries the distinction. This model is represented by Arista Networks, Inc. (ANET) and sits close to data-center bandwidth expansion. Cloud-account concentration and the durability of architecture differentiation remain central considerations.

7. 07
   SECTION 03

   03

   03.

   Section 03 of 06 — The Premium End Pairs Forecast Delivery with Defensible Positioning. Forward valuation already credits growth, raising the importance of durability. Use this divider to reset the room before the section's pages; the progress dots show where the argument stands. 7

   Everything on this page

   SECTION 03 03 VALUATION & SITUATIONS The Premium End Pairs Forecast Delivery with Defensible Positioning Forward valuation already credits growth, raising the importance of durability. 03 of 06 Networking Equipment and Services Coverage | September 2026 | Confidential | Not investment advice Sources & methodology 7

8. 08
   03 · PUBLIC MARKET VALUATION

   Different Delivery Profiles Sit at the Top and Bottom of the Valuation Range

   Different Delivery Profiles Sit at the Top and Bottom of the Valuation Range.

   Different Delivery Profiles Sit at the Top and Bottom of the Valuation Range EV / EBITDA (CY2027E) · all 6 rated companies, sorted descending · sector median 20.2x · as of 2026-09-28 Source: NeuraCap analytics platform; market data and consensus estimates as of 2026-09-28; company disclosures via SEC EDGAR where linked. Primary valuation basis: EV / EBITDA on CY2027E consensus (6 of 10 companies eligible; multiples failing the platform's plausibility gates are excluded, never plotted). Tier zones are NeuraCap groupings cut at the rated set's quartiles; every multiple quoted on this page is a median on the same EV / EBITDA (CY2027E) basis. Panel commentary is a NeuraCap view. 8

   Everything on this page

   03 · PUBLIC MARKET VALUATION Different Delivery Profiles Sit at the Top and Bottom of the Valuation Range EV / EBITDA (CY2027E) · all 6 rated companies, sorted descending · sector median 20.2x · as of 2026-09-28 Source: NeuraCap analytics platform; market data and consensus estimates as of 2026-09-28; company disclosures via SEC EDGAR where linked. Primary valuation basis: EV / EBITDA on CY2027E consensus (6 of 10 companies eligible; multiples failing the platform's plausibility gates are excluded, never plotted). Tier zones are NeuraCap groupings cut at the rated set's quartiles; every multiple quoted on this page is a median on the same EV / EBITDA (CY2027E) basis. Panel commentary is a NeuraCap view. Networking Equipment and Services Coverage | September 2026 | Confidential | Not investment advice Sources & methodology 8 PREMIUM · median 33.5x CORE · median 20.2x DISCOUNT · median 12.3x Sector median 20.2x WHAT SEPARATES THE TWO ENDS The premium end pairs growth. Fortinet, Inc. (FTNT) and Arista Networks, Inc. (ANET) sit at a 33.5x tier midpoint. Their positions combine forecast delivery with software or differentiated data-center architecture. The discount end needs proof. A10 Networks, Inc. (ATEN) and Extreme Networks, Inc. (EXTR) sit at a 12.3x tier midpoint. A clearer path on revenue quality, margin durability and product differentiation would strengthen their standing. Forward pricing tests durability. Because the lens uses forecast EBITDA, expected growth is already reflected in the ranking. The distinction is whether product mix, customer exposure and operating performance can sustain that expectation.

9. 09
   03 · VALUATION DRIVERS

   Profitability Separates the Two Ends: Names Above the 34% Margin Line Carry 31.7x Against 14.5x Below It

   Profitability Separates the Two Ends: Names Above the 34% Margin Line Carry 31.7x Against 14.5x Below It.

   Profitability Separates the Two Ends: Names Above the 34% Margin Line Carry 31.7x Against 14.5x Below It Median EV / EBITDA (CY2027E) by revenue-growth cohort and by EBITDA-margin cohort (each split at its covered median) · rated names with estimates · as of 2026-09-28 Source: NeuraCap analytics platform; market data and consensus estimates as of 2026-09-28; company disclosures via SEC EDGAR where linked. Cohort medians on rated names with the required estimates (faster n=3; slower n=3; higher-margin n=3; lower-margin n=3). Driver readings are NeuraCap views on the supplied data — association, not causation. 9

   Everything on this page

   03 · VALUATION DRIVERS Profitability Separates the Two Ends: Names Above the 34% Margin Line Carry 31.7x Against 14.5x Below It Median EV / EBITDA (CY2027E) by revenue-growth cohort and by EBITDA-margin cohort (each split at its covered median) · rated names with estimates · as of 2026-09-28 Source: NeuraCap analytics platform; market data and consensus estimates as of 2026-09-28; company disclosures via SEC EDGAR where linked. Cohort medians on rated names with the required estimates (faster n=3; slower n=3; higher-margin n=3; lower-margin n=3). Driver readings are NeuraCap views on the supplied data — association, not causation. Networking Equipment and Services Coverage | September 2026 | Confidential | Not investment advice Sources & methodology 9 EV/EBITDA, median per cohort · growth split at 11% · EBITDA-margin split at 34% The Faster-Growth Group Occupies the Higher Range On the 6 companies with a forward EV / EBITDA estimate, the 3 above 11% growth sit at 24.6x, compared with 15.9x for the 3 below the split. Revenue Quality Still Separates Similar Growth Stories Software and subscription mix, recurring revenue, support economics and customer concentration affect how durable forecast growth appears. Architecture Exposure Changes the Strategic Context Data-center fabric, merchant silicon, open networking and white-box disaggregation create different opportunities and risks across the peer set.

10. 10
    03 · SITUATION MAP

    Market Standing and Margin Profile Point to Four Different Priorities

    Market Standing and Margin Profile Point to Four Different Priorities.

    Market Standing and Margin Profile Point to Four Different Priorities Cut on EV / EBITDA vs the sector median (20.2x) (rows) and EBITDA margin vs the covered median (34%) (columns) · observations, not recommendations Source: NeuraCap analytics platform; market data and consensus estimates as of 2026-09-28; company disclosures via SEC EDGAR where linked. Situation boundaries are the cohort's own medians (Directional, NeuraCap view). This page characterises situations; it does not recommend buying or selling any security. 10

    Everything on this page

    03 · SITUATION MAP Market Standing and Margin Profile Point to Four Different Priorities Cut on EV / EBITDA vs the sector median (20.2x) (rows) and EBITDA margin vs the covered median (34%) (columns) · observations, not recommendations Source: NeuraCap analytics platform; market data and consensus estimates as of 2026-09-28; company disclosures via SEC EDGAR where linked. Situation boundaries are the cohort's own medians (Directional, NeuraCap view). This page characterises situations; it does not recommend buying or selling any security. Networking Equipment and Services Coverage | September 2026 | Confidential | Not investment advice Sources & methodology 10 Premium with Margin Above-median multiple · above-median EBITDA margin 2 names Arista Networks, Inc. (ANET) · Fortinet, Inc. (FTNT) Arista Networks, Inc. (ANET) and Fortinet, Inc. (FTNT) sit above the middle on valuation and EBITDA margin. Their agenda is to sustain forecast delivery while protecting architecture, software economics and customer quality. Premium Before Margin Above-median multiple · below-median EBITDA margin 1 names Ubiquiti Inc. (UI) Ubiquiti Inc. (UI) sits above the middle on valuation and below the 34% margin reference. The priority is to convert market standing into more durable earnings without weakening growth. Margin Before Premium Below-median multiple · above-median EBITDA margin 1 names Cisco Systems, Inc. (CSCO) Cisco Systems, Inc. (CSCO) sits below the middle on valuation and above the margin reference. The opportunity is to connect established profitability with a clearer growth, mix and product-positioning case. Rebuild Both Below-median multiple · below-median EBITDA margin 2 names Extreme Networks, Inc. (EXTR) · A10 Networks, Inc. (ATEN) Extreme Networks, Inc. (EXTR) and A10 Networks, Inc. (ATEN) sit below the middle on both measures. Their operating agenda centres on revenue quality, cost structure and defensible product positioning.

11. 11
    03 · THE AGENDA

    The Value Gap Highlights Revenue and Earnings Quality as Operating Priorities

    The Value Gap Highlights Revenue and Earnings Quality as Operating Priorities.

    The Value Gap Highlights Revenue and Earnings Quality as Operating Priorities NeuraCap view · framed as the questions an owner or acquirer should resolve · observations, not recommendations Source: NeuraCap analytics platform; market data and consensus estimates as of 2026-09-28; company disclosures via SEC EDGAR where linked. All content on this page is Directional — NeuraCap advisory judgment grounded in the cohort data shown earlier. It does not constitute investment advice. 11

    Everything on this page

    03 · THE AGENDA The Value Gap Highlights Revenue and Earnings Quality as Operating Priorities NeuraCap view · framed as the questions an owner or acquirer should resolve · observations, not recommendations Source: NeuraCap analytics platform; market data and consensus estimates as of 2026-09-28; company disclosures via SEC EDGAR where linked. All content on this page is Directional — NeuraCap advisory judgment grounded in the cohort data shown earlier. It does not constitute investment advice. Networking Equipment and Services Coverage | September 2026 | Confidential | Not investment advice Sources & methodology 11 Increase Recurring Software and Support Mix Focus product and pricing decisions on subscription, support attach and installed-base cross-sell where the customer proposition supports them. What changes the answer: The answer changes when recurring revenue shows durable retention and attractive unit economics. Deepen Differentiated Architecture Exposure Direct capital toward data-center fabric, network operating system and interoperability capabilities that remain distinct amid merchant silicon and open networking. What changes the answer: The answer changes when customer adoption broadens without increasing concentration beyond an acceptable level. Use Acquisition to Fill a Defined Product Gap Test build-versus-buy where product coverage, technical talent or channel access would take too long to develop internally. What changes the answer: The answer changes when strategic fit and integration economics outweigh the cost and execution risk.

12. 12
    SECTION 04

    04

    04.

    Section 04 of 06 — Buyers Have Paid for Architecture, Channel Access and Broader Coverage. The transaction record spans scaled platforms, adjacent infrastructure buyers and sponsors. Use this divider to reset the room before the section's pages; the progress dots show where the argument stands. 12

    Everything on this page

    SECTION 04 04 PRECEDENT TRANSACTIONS Buyers Have Paid for Architecture, Channel Access and Broader Coverage The transaction record spans scaled platforms, adjacent infrastructure buyers and sponsors. 04 of 06 Networking Equipment and Services Coverage | September 2026 | Confidential | Not investment advice Sources & methodology 12

13. 13
    04 · DEAL CASE STUDIES

    Precedent Transactions Show Buyers Reaching Across the Networking Stack

    Precedent Transactions Show Buyers Reaching Across the Networking Stack.

    Precedent Transactions Show Buyers Reaching Across the Networking Stack 2 of 14 transactions with disclosed terms, told as case studies · multiples on LTM financials at announcement where disclosed · the complete list is in the appendix · as of 2026-09-28 Source: NeuraCap analytics platform; market data and consensus estimates as of 2026-09-28; company disclosures via SEC EDGAR where linked. 54 precedent record(s) carry data-quality flags (carve out target recorded as parent; deal value unit unresolved; divestiture roles reassigned); figures are shown as recorded in the filing. 19 recorded transactions with neither a disclosed value nor a multiple are omitted from the precedent list and the case studies (kept in the companion workbook). Deal multiples are LTM at announcement (Definitive, from filings);

    Everything on this page

    04 · DEAL CASE STUDIES Precedent Transactions Show Buyers Reaching Across the Networking Stack 2 of 14 transactions with disclosed terms, told as case studies · multiples on LTM financials at announcement where disclosed · the complete list is in the appendix · as of 2026-09-28 Source: NeuraCap analytics platform; market data and consensus estimates as of 2026-09-28; company disclosures via SEC EDGAR where linked. 54 precedent record(s) carry data-quality flags (carve out target recorded as parent; deal value unit unresolved; divestiture roles reassigned); figures are shown as recorded in the filing. 19 recorded transactions with neither a disclosed value nor a multiple are omitted from the precedent list and the case studies (kept in the companion workbook). Deal multiples are LTM at announcement (Definitive, from filings); they are not directly comparable to the CY2027E public basis and no spread is claimed. "Why the deal happened" is a NeuraCap read of the recorded evidence. Networking Equipment and Services Coverage | September 2026 | Confidential | Not investment advice Sources & methodology 13 Jan-2024 $14.6B Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company added Juniper Networks, Inc. at meaningful scale. EV / LTM revenue 2.6x EV / LTM EBITDA 12.1x WHY THE DEAL HAPPENED The transaction suggests a push for broader networking coverage, installed-base access and deeper enterprise reach. The strategic fit spans scaled infrastructure and differentiated networking capabilities. HOW THE TARGET WAS VALUED The disclosed value was $14.6B, with Juniper Networks, Inc. valued at 2.6x EV / Revenue and 12.1x EV / EBITDA. The EBITDA multiple sits below the middle of the public peer range. Sep-2020 $1.1B LM Ericsson Telephone Company LM Ericsson Telephone Company moved further into enterprise wireless through Cradlepoint. EV / LTM revenue n/a EV / LTM EBITDA n/a WHY THE DEAL HAPPENED The transaction suggests interest in extending wireless-networking coverage beyond the buyer's existing communications footprint. Cradlepoint offered enterprise access and channel reach in an adjacent part of the stack. HOW THE TARGET WAS VALUED The disclosed value was $1.1B. With no transaction multiple supplied, the value benchmarks the scale of the strategic commitment rather than relative pricing.

14. 14
    SECTION 05

    05

    05.

    Section 05 of 06 — Strengthen the Economics Behind the Story Before Choosing the Next Move. Product mix, recurring revenue and architecture exposure deserve board-level attention. Use this divider to reset the room before the section's pages; the progress dots show where the argument stands. 14

    Everything on this page

    SECTION 05 05 STRATEGIC IMPLICATIONS Strengthen the Economics Behind the Story Before Choosing the Next Move Product mix, recurring revenue and architecture exposure deserve board-level attention. 05 of 06 Networking Equipment and Services Coverage | September 2026 | Confidential | Not investment advice Sources & methodology 14

15. 15
    05 · STRATEGIC IMPLICATIONS

    Market Position Is More Defensible with Durable Revenue and Earnings Quality

    Market Position Is More Defensible with Durable Revenue and Earnings Quality.

    Market Position Is More Defensible with Durable Revenue and Earnings Quality NeuraCap view · the questions this data puts on the table for the next twelve months Source: NeuraCap analytics platform; market data and consensus estimates as of 2026-09-28; company disclosures via SEC EDGAR where linked. This page is Directional — NeuraCap views drawn from the analysis in this report. Observations, not recommendations. 15

    Everything on this page

    05 · STRATEGIC IMPLICATIONS Market Position Is More Defensible with Durable Revenue and Earnings Quality NeuraCap view · the questions this data puts on the table for the next twelve months Source: NeuraCap analytics platform; market data and consensus estimates as of 2026-09-28; company disclosures via SEC EDGAR where linked. This page is Directional — NeuraCap views drawn from the analysis in this report. Observations, not recommendations. Networking Equipment and Services Coverage | September 2026 | Confidential | Not investment advice Sources & methodology 15 FOR OWNERS Align Capital with the Valued Parts of the Model Prioritise recurring software, support economics, architecture differentiation and customer quality. Treat growth that increases cloud-account or product concentration with appropriate discipline. FOR MANAGEMENT Connect Product Choices to Economic Outcomes Use pricing, product mix, retention and cost structure to improve the durability of revenue and EBITDA. Keep channel inventory and component commitments aligned with realistic demand. FOR BOARDS Resolve Build-Versus-Buy Against Clear Gaps Assess whether product breadth, technical capability and channel access are better developed internally or added through acquisition. Anchor the decision in strategic fit and integration economics.

16. 16
    SECTION 06

    06

    06.

    Section 06 of 06 — The Full Universe, Methodology and Sources. Comparables detail behind every figure in the body, the valuation basis, and where each underlying disclosure lives. Use this divider to reset the room before the section's pages; the progress dots show where the argument stands. 16

    Everything on this page

    SECTION 06 06 APPENDIX The Full Universe, Methodology and Sources Comparables detail behind every figure in the body, the valuation basis, and where each underlying disclosure lives. 06 of 06 Networking Equipment and Services Coverage | September 2026 | Confidential | Not investment advice Sources & methodology 16

17. 17
    06 · PUBLIC COMPARABLES (1 OF 1)

    Public Comparables on EV / EBITDA (CY2027E), Grouped by Valuation Tier

    Public Comparables on EV / EBITDA (CY2027E), Grouped by Valuation Tier.

    Public Comparables on EV / EBITDA (CY2027E), Grouped by Valuation Tier Teal shading marks a EV/EBITDA above the sector median (20.2x); amber marks below · 6 rated companies; 4 not rated (no eligible EV/EBITDA) · tickers link to the underlying source · as of 2026-09-28 Source: NeuraCap analytics platform; market data and consensus estimates as of 2026-09-28; company disclosures via SEC EDGAR where linked. All 6 rated rows are in this appendix and in the companion workbook, which carries the complete field set. Names without an eligible multiple are listed in the companion workbook. 17

    Everything on this page

    06 · PUBLIC COMPARABLES (1 OF 1) Public Comparables on EV / EBITDA (CY2027E), Grouped by Valuation Tier Teal shading marks a EV/EBITDA above the sector median (20.2x); amber marks below · 6 rated companies; 4 not rated (no eligible EV/EBITDA) · tickers link to the underlying source · as of 2026-09-28 Source: NeuraCap analytics platform; market data and consensus estimates as of 2026-09-28; company disclosures via SEC EDGAR where linked. All 6 rated rows are in this appendix and in the companion workbook, which carries the complete field set. Names without an eligible multiple are listed in the companion workbook. Networking Equipment and Services Coverage | September 2026 | Confidential | Not investment advice Sources & methodology 17 Company Ticker Segment EV EV/EBITDA (CY2027E) Rev growth EBITDA margin Rule of 40 PREMIUM — ≥29.9x · median 33.5x · 2 companies Fortinet, Inc. FTNT Network operating, management and observability software $127B 35.4x 11% 38% 51 Arista Networks, Inc. ANET Network acceleration and connectivity hardware $246B 31.7x 30% 49% 77 CORE — 14.8x–29.9x · median 20.2x · 2 companies Ubiquiti Inc. UI Enterprise and service-provider connectivity equipment $33.2B 24.6x 18% 31% 49 Cisco Systems, Inc. CSCO Enterprise and service-provider connectivity equipment $437B 15.9x 10% 37% 47 DISCOUNT — <14.8x · median 12.3x · 2 companies A10 Networks, Inc. ATEN Network operating, management and observability software $1.7B 14.5x 12% 31% 43 Extreme Networks, Inc. EXTR Enterprise and service-provider connectivity equipment $2.8B 10.1x 8% 17% 28

18. 18
    06 · PRECEDENT TRANSACTIONS (1 OF 2)

    All Precedent Transactions with Disclosed Terms, Newest First

    All Precedent Transactions with Disclosed Terms, Newest First.

    All Precedent Transactions with Disclosed Terms, Newest First 14 transactions with disclosed terms in this tier (33 recorded) · multiples on LTM financials at announcement where disclosed · deal values link to the underlying filing · as of 2026-09-28 Source: NeuraCap analytics platform; market data and consensus estimates as of 2026-09-28; company disclosures via SEC EDGAR where linked. 54 precedent record(s) carry data-quality flags (carve out target recorded as parent; deal value unit unresolved; divestiture roles reassigned); figures are shown as recorded in the filing. 19 recorded transactions with neither a disclosed value nor a multiple are omitted from the precedent list and the case studies (kept in the companion workbook). Deal multiples are LTM at announcement (Definitive, from filings); they are not directly comparable to the CY2027E public basis and no spread is claimed. 18

    Everything on this page

    06 · PRECEDENT TRANSACTIONS (1 OF 2) All Precedent Transactions with Disclosed Terms, Newest First 14 transactions with disclosed terms in this tier (33 recorded) · multiples on LTM financials at announcement where disclosed · deal values link to the underlying filing · as of 2026-09-28 Source: NeuraCap analytics platform; market data and consensus estimates as of 2026-09-28; company disclosures via SEC EDGAR where linked. 54 precedent record(s) carry data-quality flags (carve out target recorded as parent; deal value unit unresolved; divestiture roles reassigned); figures are shown as recorded in the filing. 19 recorded transactions with neither a disclosed value nor a multiple are omitted from the precedent list and the case studies (kept in the companion workbook). Deal multiples are LTM at announcement (Definitive, from filings); they are not directly comparable to the CY2027E public basis and no spread is claimed. Networking Equipment and Services Coverage | September 2026 | Confidential | Not investment advice Sources & methodology 18 Date Transaction EV EV/LTM Rev EV/LTM EBITDA Why it matters Jan-2024 Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company → Juniper Networks, Inc. $14.6B 2.6x 12.1x Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company acquired Juniper Networks, Inc., bringing together scaled enterprise infrastructure and networking capabilities. Dec-2020 Viasat, Inc. → RigNet, Inc. n/a n/a 5.9x Viasat, Inc. announced the acquisition of RigNet, Inc., linking communications infrastructure with network services exposure. Sep-2020 LM Ericsson Telephone Company → Cradlepoint $1.1B n/a n/a LM Ericsson Telephone Company announced the acquisition of Cradlepoint, extending its reach across enterprise wireless networking. Apr-2020 NVIDIA Corporation → Mellanox Technologies, Ltd. n/a 5.5x n/a NVIDIA Corporation acquired Mellanox Technologies, Ltd., pairing accelerated computing with data-center connectivity. Jun-2018 Ribbon Communications Inc. → Edgewater Networks, Inc. n/a 1.7x 26.8x Ribbon Communications Inc. announced the acquisition of Edgewater Networks, Inc., broadening its communications and network product coverage. Nov-2016 Broadcom Limited → Brocade Communications Systems, Inc. n/a 9.5x 9.8x Broadcom Limited announced the acquisition of Brocade Communications Systems, Inc., linking semiconductor-linked infrastructure with networking assets. Nov-2016 LSI; Broadcom → Brocade n/a 12.3x 18.4x LSI; Broadcom announced the acquisition of Brocade, reflecting strategic interest in broader infrastructure coverage. Mar-2015 Hewlett Packard Enterprise → Aruba Networks, Inc. n/a 3.3x n/a Hewlett Packard Enterprise announced the acquisition of Aruba Networks, Inc., expanding enterprise networking and wireless LAN exposure. Dec-2014 Ontario Teachers'; Thoma Bravo → Riverbed Technology n/a 12.8x n/a Ontario Teachers'; Thoma Bravo announced the acquisition of Riverbed Technology, showing sponsor interest in established networking assets.

19. 19
    06 · PRECEDENT TRANSACTIONS (2 OF 2)

    All Precedent Transactions with Disclosed Terms, Newest First

    All Precedent Transactions with Disclosed Terms, Newest First.

    All Precedent Transactions with Disclosed Terms, Newest First 14 transactions with disclosed terms in this tier (33 recorded) · multiples on LTM financials at announcement where disclosed · deal values link to the underlying filing · as of 2026-09-28 Source: NeuraCap analytics platform; market data and consensus estimates as of 2026-09-28; company disclosures via SEC EDGAR where linked. 54 precedent record(s) carry data-quality flags (carve out target recorded as parent; deal value unit unresolved; divestiture roles reassigned); figures are shown as recorded in the filing. 19 recorded transactions with neither a disclosed value nor a multiple are omitted from the precedent list and the case studies (kept in the companion workbook). Deal multiples are LTM at announcement (Definitive, from filings); they are not directly comparable to the CY2027E public basis and no spread is claimed. 19

    Everything on this page

    06 · PRECEDENT TRANSACTIONS (2 OF 2) All Precedent Transactions with Disclosed Terms, Newest First 14 transactions with disclosed terms in this tier (33 recorded) · multiples on LTM financials at announcement where disclosed · deal values link to the underlying filing · as of 2026-09-28 Source: NeuraCap analytics platform; market data and consensus estimates as of 2026-09-28; company disclosures via SEC EDGAR where linked. 54 precedent record(s) carry data-quality flags (carve out target recorded as parent; deal value unit unresolved; divestiture roles reassigned); figures are shown as recorded in the filing. 19 recorded transactions with neither a disclosed value nor a multiple are omitted from the precedent list and the case studies (kept in the companion workbook). Deal multiples are LTM at announcement (Definitive, from filings); they are not directly comparable to the CY2027E public basis and no spread is claimed. Networking Equipment and Services Coverage | September 2026 | Confidential | Not investment advice Sources & methodology 19 Date Transaction EV EV/LTM Rev EV/LTM EBITDA Why it matters Dec-2014 Thoma Bravo, L.P. → Riverbed Technology, Inc. n/a 3.2x 17.4x Oct-2014 NetScout Systems, Inc. → Danaher Corporation Communications Business n/a n/a 13.8x Jul-2008 Brocade Communications Systems → Foundry Networks n/a 12.0x n/a n/a HP Inc. → Aruba Networks n/a n/a 12.4x n/a ADTRAN Holdings, Inc. → Adtran Networks SE n/a 1.3x n/a Value shown as recorded in the filing; deal value unit unresolved, status defaulted announced.

20. 20
    06 · METHODOLOGY

    Sources, Assumptions and Data Quality

    Sources, Assumptions and Data Quality.

    Sources, Assumptions and Data Quality How this report was built, what was excluded, and where every underlying disclosure lives · as of 2026-09-28 Every figure in this report links to the record it was taken from. Where a figure has no link, the appendix names its source and the basis on which it was read. 20

    Everything on this page

    06 · METHODOLOGY Sources, Assumptions and Data Quality How this report was built, what was excluded, and where every underlying disclosure lives · as of 2026-09-28 Every figure in this report links to the record it was taken from. Where a figure has no link, the appendix names its source and the basis on which it was read. Networking Equipment and Services Coverage | September 2026 | Confidential | Not investment advice 20 VALUATION BASIS Primary valuation basis: EV / EBITDA on CY2027E consensus (6 of 10 companies eligible; multiples failing the platform's plausibility gates are excluded, never plotted). EV / EBITDA on CY2027E is the lead convention: it is the sector-appropriate prior for Networking Equipment and Services and it clears the coverage gate with 6 of 10 companies (60%). EV / Revenue, P / E are carried as a cross-check. The set earns: 6 of the 6 companies with a reported forward EBITDA carry a meaningful one, so the profit multiple leads and a revenue multiple would understate what the market is pricing. DATA QUALITY & EXCLUSIONS 3 records were excluded or quarantined by the platform's validation gates (unit errors, implausible ratios, ineligible securities and classification failures); the full ledger ships in the companion tables and never feeds a statistic in this report. DEFINITIVE VS DIRECTIONAL Definitive content is disclosed or consensus data passed through stated arithmetic. Directional content — tier boundaries, situation cuts, "why it matters" commentary, the agenda pages — is NeuraCap analyst judgment and is labeled as such where it appears. WHAT THIS REPORT IS NOT This report characterises a sector. It does not recommend buying, selling or holding any security, and no statement in it should be read as investment advice or a price target. WHERE THE DATA LIVES 519 registered source documents stand behind the figures in this report. Metric hyperlinks throughout the deck open the specific filing or data record; by publisher: sec.gov (518) · home.treasury.gov (1). The companion workbook beside this deck carries the complete source index.

21. 21

    Durable Software Economics and Differentiated Architecture Sit at the Higher End.

    Durable Software Economics and Differentiated Architecture Sit at the Higher End..

    Closing — Durable Software Economics and Differentiated Architecture Sit at the Higher End. The companion tables beside this deck carry the full universe, the exclusion ledger and the complete source index for any figure a client wants to trace. 21

    Everything on this page

    Durable Software Economics and Differentiated Architecture Sit at the Higher End. NeuraCap AI — Networking Equipment and Services Coverage September 2026 · Prepared by NeuraCap AI · Confidential Networking Equipment and Services Coverage | September 2026 | Confidential | Not investment advice Sources & methodology 21

More coverage in Information Technology

• Sector Report · Sep 28, 2026Insurance Software Sector Outlook — September 2026
• Sector Report · Sep 28, 2026Health Care Software Sector Outlook — September 2026
• Sector Report · Sep 28, 2026Human Capital Management Software Sector Outlook — September 2026
• Sector Report · Sep 28, 2026Financial Management and Accounting Software Sector Outlook — September 2026